I haven’t gone to see the newest Twilight film myself, but I hear that Sparkles actually WASN’T killed by Buffy in the last one and now what’s-her-name has the pick of the litter (pun intended). If that’s true, then I have to stamp these two items as FACTS (just like the MythBusters taught us to) and tell everyone that being TEAM DEAD DOG is probably their best choice.
Necrophilia or Bestiality?
Graph by: broerej123 via Graph Jam Builder
-
-
Copy & paste this:
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
support cedric diggory… edward sucks.
quite literally, too…
… Vampires aren’t dead
And you aren’t retarded.
Good to know.
And the grass isn’t green
And the sky isn’t blue
and the ocean isn’t salty.
and the c-c-c-combo is broken
Yes, they are. Please go read the actual legends vampires are based on.
They are, fellow Grammar Nazi.
Also, don’t ellipses connect with the following word?
WIN. Lol.
Don’t forget the pedophilia! and yes… vampires are the undead. Zombies who use lotion and suck your neck like a meth addict sucks their pipe.
EDWARD IS A HUFFLEPUFF EDWARD IS A HUFFLEPUFF!!!
And Hufflepuffs, as Ron so aptly put it, are a load of duffers.
Wait a moment guys! In the first book when Edward and Bella start falling in love. Bella is 17 and Edward is around 109. That makes it pedophilia. O_o
Pedobear has vampire minions.
please, pedobear always makes his hands dirty, a little fairy like edward is to girly for pedobear, even little girls are more butch then him… the ones that hate twilight anyway
actually, since bella is ALREADY 17, it’s not considered pedophilia anymore. their situation is quite legal if charlie and/or renee agreed…
109 > 18… simple math…
Then you throw in Jacob falling in love with a baby and you get pedophilia.
Actually Edward is 17; he only exists for 109 years total. Subtract seventeen for his vampire years. You know, like Aang the 112 year old Avatar.
I’ve never heard this joke before.
(Sarcastic comment is sarcastic)
Sarcastic comment wasn’t sarcastic.
Neither have I.
(Sarcastic Moron is Sarcastic.)
Team Necro!
Speaking purely as
1)a theater employee,
2)decidedly NOT a teenage girl, and
3)a fan of coherent literature and movies,
my life currently sucks, bigtime.
On the bright side: it’s doing surprisingly poorly attendance-wise, and with any luck it’ll fold soon.
Yeah, you wish. You know as well as everyone does that this is a major franchise and will be one of the summer’s biggest blockbusters because it has garnered such a following; despite some people constantly making the same tired @ss jokes about the series.
Also, the film’s opening topped that of New Moon at somewhere around $30 mil for the midnight shows. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
I’d like to see you tout your “ability to make money = quality” argument when people are using the same “tired @ss jokes” about Justin Beiber and Miley Cyrus.
WIN!
Keep it classy. Machine gun blow!
No it didn’t. New moon made 72 mill, Eclipse only made 68 mill opening night.
Double win!
There is a difference between pointing out comical facts and a joke. These are comical facts, just as there is a difference between between a philia and a healthy attraction. If your statistics are correct, then MANY people choose philia.
//decidedly NOT a teenage girl//
When did you “decide” not to be a teenage girl? I would have thought that would have been decided for you…
I don’t know which is worse, having sex with a sparkly dead fairy or with a wolf boy
oh it could be much worse. The wolf boy could fall in love with the BABY that you had with the sparkly dead fairy. *shudders*
Imprinting is not the same as falling in love. Satire is only funny when the facts are accurate
In the most simple form ask yourself which is more creepy, f***ing a corpse or f***ing a dog. I think corpse is the more creepy of the two. Either way, both are creepy.
No, it’s bestiality. Look it up or just type into a Word document and let spell-check correct you.
Oh snap! Meh was toooooold!
DONT GOOGLE SEARCH IT!!! XD
As Col. Quaritch aptly put it, “And that’s how you scatter the roaches.”
Don’t forget that another of the werewolves is also a pedophile – imprinting on a two year old???!
I love how negative you all are and still seem to know a lot of the story
i thought it was a decent love story despite Bella becoming way overly depressed when Edward left her.
and yes the shapeshifter (not a werewolf) imprinted on a newborn baby, but imprinting does not mean its sexual in any way. even though i don’t think the author made a wise choice by putting that extra bit of pedo-bear-ness into her book.
The baby is just Bella 2. Not really a separate person, just an extension of Bella. So Bella gets to have both Edward and Jacob after all.
true, true
One must know one’s adversary. We simply refuse to be remain blind to the very obvious philias (necro and zoophilia) present in the narrative.
If the Antis didn’t read it, they’d be told that they’re in no fit position to hate it. Thus, they learn all they can to make fun of it.
I salute thee, brave warriors.
She has what many of the so called males on this thread lack, as Alec Baldwin so famously put it: brass balls.
When one actually begins to care about the opinions the masses have about one’s art to the point where you sacrifice the quality of said art, one becomes less like an artist, and more like a pansy.
I remember a couple of years ago my friends recommended the Twilight books and after reading it I told them this was basically Stephenie Myer venting her secret obsession between necrophilia and bestiality. I was practically shunned. Sad how girls think an overly obsessive stalker vampire and a barely tamed man beast are romantic…
Stay the hell away from the Anita Blake novels…that’s where it really gets explored.
But they are soooo addictive!!!
Anita Blake that is… not twilight… I really tried to read it I did… I just can’t stand how Mayers writes.
Anita Blake novels? I don’t even want to know.
We forgot pedophilia
ok i don’t know what they mean can someone tell me? :/ and Edward is a pedo
Bestiality = Sex with animals. Necrophilia = Sexual interest for the dead.
Please remember to put “of a different species” when refering to bestiality, lest you catagorize us all zoophiles (since Homo sapiens are also part of kingdom Animalia).
So does that mean that all of our ancestors were bestialists, considering that we had sex with Neanderthals right after we came out of Africa?
Yeah, turns out Africans are the only pure humans.
It’s “bestiality”. True story.
You have your team “dead dog”. i have my team “twilight is a heap of garbage and always will be.”
And yet, nobody cares
Actually it is spelled “Bestiality”. Doesn’t make sense to me but ehh I’ve seen stranger spelled words
A friend of mine went to see all the Twilight movies and is a total fangirl. And when she saw this she laughed so hard she almost fell. Which makes this graph so much more fun. XD
It’s the new “cool” thing to hate on Twilight. People want to be different and now follow the crowd.
And while I love Twilight, I too am a fan of “coherent literature.” It’s kind of insulting to suggest just because someone likes Twilight automatically means they have no brain and have no other interests.
Totally agree with you. In my opinion the haters are even more annoying than the actual fans.
No one even insinuated that you have now brain, we stated that you have a subconcious love of either bestiality (sex with animals of a different species then one’s own) or necrophilia (sexual attraction to the dead). I don’t know about the rest, but I hate that series simply because it is overtly uninteresting, bland, and not very creative or imaginitive (plus the bestiality and necrophila element).
Good to see someone openly have a different opinion about this series. The only thing I would say dearest Stephanie should have done was give Twilight a more maturing element, like the Harry Potter series did. It would have given the sex in Breaking Dawn a more mature and elaborate approach.
But its an AWESOME series, and I like how she incorporates real and made up legends into her book. And the +/- 1 gene difference between the Quileutes, vampires, and humans: genius
LOL, so that’s what they like to call it know days?
Actually it IS spelled bestiality, try using a dictionary next time. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bestiality
Holy SMOKES! What is this crap you guys are talking about and watching??? Imprinting on babies?? Bestiality and Pediphiles??!! A BABY BEING ANOTHER PART OF ITS MUM???!! SPARKLY vampires?? HAVING SEX WITH A DOG??!! What is this crap??!! That series is MESSED UP! YEESH! Glad I’ve never read the books, watched the movies, or gone crazy over it! BARF!
It’s Pederasty.
And it gets worse, believe me.
Wow….that’s….SAD and SCARY!
It’s called satire, grow a humerus why don’t you
So Furry Fandom then?
Yes, you caught me. I have a secret desire to boink a dead guy. Or a really hairy one. What other reason could I possibly enjoy the books? Couldn’t have anything to do with the actual “true love conquers all” aspect of the book. Not at all. What have I been thinking these past couple of years? You have certainly opened my eyes.
“Thinking” and Twilight do not go together in the same paragraph.
The “True Love Conquers All”? More like “Creepy Stalker Guy who Watches you sleep at night, trashes your truck so you can’t hang out with your friends, and socially abuses you is the perfect guy.”
I gotta go with bestiality.
Those werewolves. Fffff. And come on, it’s not a hard decision. Sparkling lipstick-wearing cold-skinned pale pretty boy or a big fuzzy werewolf who, when tamed, would make an epic guard dog.
I gotta say,the only reason I like the Twilight series (or to be more specific New Moon and Eclipse) was because of Jacob. In New Moon he was so nice and took care of Bella after Edward left her and continued fight for her heart in Eclipse. Sure, when he turned into a werewolf it was a bit unsettling, but at least he could transform back into a human whenever he pleased and he’d be fully human again eventually. It’s not like they would have sex when Jacob was in dog/wolf mode so it’s not really bestiality.
they forgot a very huge other topic in this, the PEDOPHILIA!
all the people in the world that are makeing fun of twilight are just to dumb to read it and dont wanna admit it so to those people GET A LIFE!! twilight is awesome and if you would take the time to read it you would see that to
I have read them. My friend lent them too me. And how is anyone “too dumb to read it”? A major problem people have with Twilight is that it has too many adjectives and is basically at five year old level. Oh, and this is unrelated but Bella got 115 on a Mary Sue litmus test
Consider what she(or she; ya never know) is actually trying to say. Many people that insult anything are (voluntarily)ignorant of its subject matter. People complain about the same things: “oh vampires sparkle? gay!. Wolves don’t transform in the day! Sunlight kills them!”
come on, really? Stephanie Meyer took a bold leap at something, and it went well, critics and all. Consider some of these points:
1. If the skin of these vampires are supposed to be hard as diamonds, why wouldn’t they share other physical properties? The diamond lattice shape and the covalent bonds of the carbon in diamonds give them their strength. I don’t know about the “refractive index” of their skin cells, but you never know
2. The ancient lore of the Quileute tribe does involve men taking the from of wolves.
3. Nowhere in Bram Stoker’s Dracula does it state that the Vampires will fry in the UltraViolet. nowhere. He should be the only authority the idiots (the masses) should concern themselves with
4. Jacob and Nessie will Birth a Super Sayain Twilight-powered Wolf/Vampire/Human hybrid. It will be fucking awesome!
omg i had never heard someone talk like this about TWILIGHT… i guess im missing out in ”real life”.. .
im not going to lie i am a big FAN of TWILIGHT and i think edward is way better
NECROPHILIA IS WAY BBEETTEERR
PLEASE COMMENT BEFORE TUESDAY