The likelyhood of a psychotic killer simply walking after a sprinting victim.
Graph by: ushuturFACE via Graph Jam Builder
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Who will be on the cover of the next Oprah magazine? | What The Force would be used for if it actually existed Next »
The likelyhood of a psychotic killer simply walking after a sprinting victim.
» 16 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
natalie on Top 10 Read Books Spincycle on Robb Stark 2012 natalie on Not Sure If I Should Try to Co… greyspot00 on Not Sure If I Should Try to Co… greyspot00 on Not Sure If I Should Try to Co… Poptart on Strange Facts About Our Feline… Somanynamestochoosef… on It’s the Only State They… Ldude893 on A Roller Coaster of Feels Dexaan on Strange Facts About Our Feline… Master of all that f… on Sorry I Didn’t Pick Up o… Master of all that f… on Not Sure If I Should Try to Co… guatemalan boy on The Sovereign Nation of F… OleJ on Not Sure If I Should Try to Co… moarqq on Not Sure If I Should Try to Co… alyssa on Sorry I Didn’t Pick Up o… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
First! Now I have to shoot myself for typing that.
Real psychotic killers don’t pursue. They engage and then disable, so there is no pursuit necessary. I’m just sayin’.
‘Cause in the movies they don’t need to run to catch up…
all three comments above suck balls.
You sir are correct
Yes, let’s use a pie chart to show a relationship between two things. That’s exactly what a graph used to show something in terms of 100% should be used for.
glad I’m not the only one who noticed this. And it’s so close, too.. if you changed the title to “Psychotic killers simply walking after a sprinting victim” it would be marginally acceptable.
They had to get the idea from somewhere… Like the other thousands of horror flicks with chase scenes, or an actual event…
Am I the only one who this makes absolutely no sense to? What would the psychotic killer normally do? Sprint, too? Shrug and say “oh well, I guess I have to go find someone else to kill”? Can someone please explain this to me as if I were a four-year-old, because I’m just not getting it. thanks
If it were me, I’d dress up as Christian Bale, get myself a chainsaw, and run in screaming pursuit. You can’t always depend on the victim to break a leg.
Basically, the chart is pointing out how ridiculous it is that in horror movies a killer like Jason or Michael Myers is “walking” after a victim that is running or “sprinting” away from them; it’s saying it never happens in real life because they would get away lol.
There was a commercial where a “victim” ran away. The psycho pursued, got tired, and gave up. I forget if it was for sneakers, or something like milk, but it was a good commercial.
In the movies, the “victim” always trips over something, falls down, twists an ankle, and screams like a girly-girl. Buffy stumbles and falls to let the vampire catch up with her, and then kicks its ass to dust.
Likelihood. Just so you know.
so good
This should’ve been a Bar Graph.
yes, I do chase after my victims. In my Ford Fusion!!!