Comments on: Success is…

By: default

default — Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:03:48 +0000

Repeats are bad.

By: ariadne

ariadne — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:33:44 +0000

yep. an insurance company. with lemon jelly’s ‘staunton lick’.

By: Kelly

Kelly — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:39:01 +0000

Its hilarious how you nutjobs see politics in EVERY single article that is posted. The article could be about iPods or moutain climbing or teddy bears, but sure enough some political whackos come along.

By: JuliaJolie

JuliaJolie — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:07:55 +0000

Substitute “making money” for “breeding children”, move the peak to the left a little bit and there you have the cliché for female accomplishments.

By: Critter Rhode

Critter Rhode — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:16:04 +0000

By: Enry

Enry — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:19:26 +0000

And here we have the polar opposite of being a loser: being a pretentious douche.

What normal people are is something in between these two extremes.

By: Philip

Philip — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 10:00:59 +0000

C-C-C-C-Combo Breaker.

By: Denz

Denz — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:13:31 +0000

Repeats aren’t as bad as you might think

By: roa

roa — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:38:48 +0000

I’m sorry your parents don’t love you enough to help you through school. Most people who attend a college or university are living in the dorms during the semester and with their parents in between. I was grateful to have parents that helped pay my tuition so I wouldn’t have a tremendous debt upon graduation, paid for my expenses (with in reason) so I could focus on studying instead of having to work, and gave me a place to stay for the 3 months of summer that I wasn’t in school, because interestingly most apartments won’t do a 3 month lease, especially for a college student with no credit.
It’s not something that’s aspired to, it’s just a reality.

By: papajon)s1

papajon)s1 — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:38:27 +0000

What’s wrong with repeating a graph subject line anyway? In fact, I’m all for repetition; I learn almost solely by repetition. It seems like its a benefit when it comes to friends and sex and money … not so much for peeing in your pants though…

But honestly, if you base your success on mostly sex and money your setting yourself up for massive failure. Maybe set your sites on something more noble like ‘service to others’ perhaps? … wait sorry, I forgot I am living in Obama’s America. That’s considered evil now. …I’ll just go slink quietly back to my cave.

By: Stufreddy

Stufreddy — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:30:43 +0000

I’ve seen this graph repeated at least once a month but stated differently.

By: Skippy

Skippy — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:41:25 +0000

There was an ad with this on here (new zealand) agggesss ago. Forreal.

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:36:01 +0000

This is the best graph I have seen so far.

By: ladykitteh

ladykitteh — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:00:45 +0000

Ummm… I’m attending a prestigious university, am living with my boyfriend in our (rented) apartment at 21, I’m doing a paid internship and I’ll have a paid job next to my Master classes next year.

And before the trolling starts, I moved out at 18 and have paid for all my university/life expenses since. Living with your parents at 21 IMHO isn’t something you should aspire to…

By: Girlysprite

Girlysprite — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:31:22 +0000

I actually liked this one, and haven’t seen it before. And I find it to be quite accurate, which is quite a plus on graphjam these days.

By: Girlysprite

Girlysprite — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:29:51 +0000

Repeats are bad.

By: trickster

trickster — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:11:10 +0000

Repeats are bad.

By: John M

John M — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:05:33 +0000

Repeats are bad.

By: Squiggles

Squiggles — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:44:00 +0000

Repeats are bad.

By: lolz

lolz — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:19:01 +0000

whoever made this graph has a really pointless view of life

By: Max

Max — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:51:11 +0000

The scale of the x-axis hurts me.

By: Sqwirk

Sqwirk — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:41:17 +0000

I guess for the “lower classes” you can move the line left 15 years.

Leave home at 16-18, married with kids by early 20s, already old at age 25-30, in ill health by age 55-60, dead in your 70s.

By: Sqwirk

Sqwirk — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:14:06 +0000

Since for most people attending a prestigious university and then being able to do a presumably unpaid internship is dependent on having parents with the resources to take care of your living expenses…. probably yes?

By: JasonM

JasonM — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:51:19 +0000

please! No more graphs that are about things that are acceptable as a kid, not as an adult, but ok as a senior. This formula is over used!!!!

By: Lucy

Lucy — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:19:30 +0000

You live with your parents at 21? So… are you having sex in your twin bed (no doubt fitted with Barbie bedsheets)when your mommy is at work?

By: Austin

Austin — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:14:41 +0000

Good to know I wasn’t having some weird de ja vue moment. This really wasn’t very funny the first time it was done either.

By: ann

ann — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:50:38 +0000

Nop. At 21 you are pretty much living with your parents, going to college and craving for sex. You expect to make some money after graduation and after having some experience, or after growing a business, so that would be later in your 30′s. I think its accurate.

By: AL

AL — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:14:22 +0000

The real line would be up top from about 21 on.

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:14:11 +0000

The prose format of this joke works much better.

By: :)

:) — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:22:08 +0000

hadn’t*

By: :)

:) — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:21:32 +0000

Nice one; I haven’t see it yet.

By: Wally M. Art

Wally M. Art — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:15:33 +0000

Repeats are bad.

By: Whutda

Whutda — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:01:58 +0000

Wtf? I already saw this graph. Its time for something new and funny, not the same stupid thing twice.