Comments on: What stars do with their newfound fame

By: anon

anon — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:04:29 +0000

That was a terrible book. I suggest, say, “Snow Crash” or “The Gargoyle” Instead.
Although the first one might actually /encourage/ pompous personalities….

By: GAWD(lawl)

GAWD(lawl) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:55:21 +0000

it would be something like ‘remember to use a condom when you have sex’

By: Truthgiver

Truthgiver — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:22:46 +0000

“teach mortal values”

“now remember kids, you will all die one day”

HaHhahAhAHAHahaa

By: Deer0ck

Deer0ck — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:25:22 +0000

Mortal values?

By: EHW

EHW — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:50:08 +0000

there’s no option for “screw up and screw self big time?” Boy I thought that would be here.

By: lalala

lalala — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:57:24 +0000

That’s crap. The ones on that graph as just as stupid as any of the graphs here, including this one.

By: lalala

lalala — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:50:43 +0000

Ha! Because calling people “judgmental, pernickety, pompous windbags” is so light and carefree of you.

Besides, why use “pernickety”? To prove that you’re so much smarter than everyone else? It makes you sound pretty pompous yourself. Read Chapter 12 of To Kill A Mockingbird. You could benefit from it.

By: Laureny

Laureny — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:34:07 +0000

The question is would anyone actually want celebrities, Paris Hilton for example, attempting to give teens “helpful advice”?

By: hullaballoo

hullaballoo — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:36:35 +0000

obviously this person ignores every celebrity if they think no celebrity does any drugs after they get famous

By: Mudrock1000

Mudrock1000 — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:38:17 +0000

oh no guys. I think i may have suffered a moral wound.

By: RxCowboy

RxCowboy — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:50:21 +0000

We should be teaching the immortal values. Mortal values are so temporal.

By: Squirrely__Kitteh

Squirrely__Kitteh — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:37:20 +0000

*cough cough* mileycyrus *cough cough*

By: Lily

Lily — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:17:46 +0000

I don’t know if anyone understands sarcasm, but Mr Bocker was pointing out how many people had made such a comment.

By: bodo

bodo — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:16:00 +0000

Hey! I resemble that comment! What’re you…wait…

By: dogsleder

dogsleder — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:31:11 +0000

Mostly these comments are the usual crap. If you’re interested in reading some literate, funny and informative comments, go to the ones for “Working the Info Desk at the Bookstore.” You can read all of them and never, even once, get disgusted at the crappy, nit-picky comments.

By: thestashattacked

thestashattacked — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:31:40 +0000

That’s because Chuck Norris only has mortal values.

By: thestashattacked

thestashattacked — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:30:47 +0000

Finally! Someone else who thinks everyone else needs to lighten up!

By: thestashattacked

thestashattacked — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:29:41 +0000

redundant WIN

By: whistle blower

whistle blower — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:36:59 +0000

Does Tiger Woods count? Cuz he’s always doing celebrity stuff too.

By: Sean

Sean — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:47:33 +0000

LOLOL DUDE TC WANNA GO AIM SOMETIME? THAT WAS RLY COOL WE CAN PLAY SCRABBLE ONLINE TOGETHER

On another note “mortal,” lol.

By: tc

tc — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:26:21 +0000

he was pointing out the typo. Mortal / moral.

Rearrange the following words: “High horse, get off your”

Cheers fella

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:47:53 +0000

Very much so.

By: kg333

kg333 — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:14:40 +0000

[sigh]…what process do these things go through to get to the front page anyway? Is there someway for the maker to stack the system despite clearly shoddy work?

By: omni_squirrel

omni_squirrel — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:27:39 +0000

As I’m sure they meant moral values, I have to say…That orange slice is like WAY too big.

By: omni_squirrel

omni_squirrel — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:25:14 +0000

^ lol! ^

By: TPS

TPS — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:40:38 +0000

And I thought only Chuck Norris teaches anything about mortality…

By: Feisty

Feisty — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:12:01 +0000

Why are judgmental, pernickety, pompous windbags allowed to create replies?

And before you correct me on pernickety … look it up

By: bodo

bodo — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:56:48 +0000

*enables sarcasm detector for future readers/posters*

By: RJ

RJ — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:34:05 +0000

Omg, health care doesn’t have a space in it. Is there another typo.

By: Alice

Alice — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:31:31 +0000

Mortal values! OBVIOUSLY the maker meant die when you get old.

By: Xeno the Hedgehog

Xeno the Hedgehog — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:28:19 +0000

My dad once went to Louisiana and volunteered to help clean up the mess after Katrina hit. His task was to help gut one of the destroyed homes and help remove the clutter so that a new one could be built in its place. He said that while he was down there, celebrities showed up for photo shoots, had their time on camera, and then left without lifting a finger to help. So the celebrities get credit for doing absolutely nothing, while the people who actually bust their asses to do something worthwhile aren’t even acknowledged. Tell me, why exactly are these “stars” held in such high regard?

By: Andyroo

Andyroo — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:21:58 +0000

“mortal” values???
Why are uneducated retards allowed to create graphs for this site?

By: Bappi

Bappi — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:55:01 +0000

Has anybody mentioned the typo yet?

By: NP

NP — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:43:11 +0000

Yes, because there must be 90-100 different celebrity clothing lines at Wal-Mart. WTF is this person talking about? Fail much?

By: Bvio

Bvio — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:41:07 +0000

^ made me LOL

By: RJ

RJ — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:36:21 +0000

Nor did he see the ones that already mentioned the mortal/moral spelling mistake.

By: RJ

RJ — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:35:07 +0000

You said, “…therein…”

I am trying to do the numbers on how many stars there are related to the number of clothing lines at Mal-Wart.

By: Thomas A. Anderson

Thomas A. Anderson — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:34:07 +0000

I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this or not, but Nick R. Bocker obviously didn’t read any of the other comments before posting.

By: GoSeaHox

GoSeaHox — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:31:59 +0000

Moral Kombat. LMAO

By: Nick R. Bocker

Nick R. Bocker — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:14:18 +0000

I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this or not, but the submitter of this graph labeled one piece of the pie chart therein with the word “mortal” where they probably meant “moral.”

By: Moral Kombat

Moral Kombat — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:59:20 +0000

Moral Kombat? It would be immoral to combat over morals…

By: sane person

sane person — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:48:54 +0000

Mortal values?

By: Dave's not here man

Dave's not here man — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:28:00 +0000

Yeah, but this comment is TOTALLY hilarious.

By: Scorpion

Scorpion — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:27:24 +0000

FINISH HIM!

Morality.

By: Nate01

Nate01 — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:25:07 +0000

i r teh tr00lz

By: dave

dave — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:16:44 +0000

Hey, someone submit this as “humor fail”

By: ddg

ddg — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:16:02 +0000

MORTAL VALUES…. fight.

By: bodo

bodo — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:13:21 +0000

It’s the latest video game, right? Isn’t it? No?

By: ClariPossum

ClariPossum — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:08:10 +0000

Yeah the “mortal” thing made me twitch, too, LoL.

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:07:05 +0000

“Mortal” values? Isn’t that what Heath Ledger did?

Do we mean “Moral” values? How do you add a negative quantity in a pie chart?