Comments on: Animal abuse in peta’s view

By: Tiber Septim

Tiber Septim — Mon, 22 Aug 2011 01:27:33 +0000

I lol’d.

By: Person

Person — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:30:27 +0000

Next thing you know, everyone should stop eating because plants are also living things and are able to communicate in their own ways.

By: Sara

Sara — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:30:49 +0000

I agree with PETA’s point, animals should be treated with respect and should not be abused, I’m a vegatarian myself but WTF with the pictures REALLY PEOPLE?! THAT’S WHAT WE’VE BECOME!!!!!

By: ily

ily — Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:16:03 +0000

Those women dont look like they are forced, before writing anything why do you guys look at their faces, they look pretty darn happy. And this is america, they have the right leave and not do anything if they do not wish. Take back you words

By: Chocaholic

Chocaholic — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:04:37 +0000

Typos, sorry. It’s the internet, don’t scream. Grammar Nazis.
*= a proud, proud member.
*of
*Mass
*of

By: Chocaholic

Chocaholic — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:03:09 +0000

People eating tasty animals+me+ a proud proud member. I fish. I hunt. I eat the turkeys, ducks, and fish I catch. Native Americans did that.
Another thing. Since HMETA(Hypocrites for the MAss Euthanization od Animals) members are obviously liberals, wouldn’t that mean they support abortion? So animal lives are more important than human?

By: Chocaholic

Chocaholic — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:52:53 +0000

Thirded. IT’s A WORD!!!

By: :P

:P — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:49:31 +0000

we’re made out of meat.
the actual rationale for making them out of meat is so other animals can eat them.

By: misschipz33

misschipz33 — Mon, 24 May 2010 20:28:33 +0000

Thanks.

By: Isa

Isa — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:34:58 +0000

I have always thought of it that way. That’s because peta things all pet owners are cruel abusive maniacs. I mean, Animals, eat Animals. I wonder if they realize that…

By: Isa

Isa — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:25:11 +0000

just a typo. u and i are next to each other.

By: Isa

Isa — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:18:28 +0000

get a sense of humor and relax.

By: Hannah

Hannah — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:37:30 +0000

NOT FUNNY!!!!

By: Lisa

Lisa — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:21:17 +0000

Seconded.

By: LaLaLand

LaLaLand — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:53:30 +0000

I saw somthing that sayes…
“If God didn’t want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat!”

By: Poodleinacan

Poodleinacan — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:05:25 +0000

If PETA complains about Canadien seal hunting but not about French foie gras…..well there f*ckers, because foie gras is worst, they fill ducks to death and stuff…….by since I “hate” people who say things like OMG look at the Canadien seal hunters skin and get them to there boat alive pictures that we cannot see! …Those people….well I like to a laugh out of them.

By: Jean

Jean — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:58:16 +0000

Ugh, disgusting, really. What sexist jerks.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:23:10 +0000

they are huge women abusers.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:18:51 +0000

with a “who cares” value.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:16:13 +0000

friggin’ hypocrites.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:12:10 +0000

People are animals, technically according to Carolus Linnaeus. People drink animal milk, and thats not vegan, so that’s high up on PETA’s blacklist. Women breastfeed their children. If humans are animals, drinking animal milk is bad, and babies drink human milk, then aren’t babies murderous? And don’t women let themselves be killed? THINK, PETA, THINK!

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:03:13 +0000

and at least you can admit that.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:52:58 +0000

i have a friend and her family is vegetarian. she doesnt go crazy about me eating a ham sandwich. or sub. or tuna. or meat. or fish.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:34:08 +0000

http://www.petacatalog.com/products/Fight_Breedism_Fitted_T_Shirt_As_seen_on_The_Biggest_Loser-196-0.html

they are stinking hypocrites they put down over 2 thousand animals and let only 7, yes you read that right, SEVEN animals be adopted, and now they’re saying adopt.

http://www.petakillsanimals.com/

see? 7.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:27:47 +0000

wow, they’re mass murderers of animals. i dont care if they do it humanely, but those numbers are just unnecessary!

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:23:09 +0000

holy crap. when animals are pets they are loved by their owners. unless they are abused. but that cant really be controlled.

By: princess0764

princess0764 — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:18:44 +0000

@poop:
No l’idiot, it means your mom. WHAT DO YOU THINK IT MEANS! The animals, duh.

By: Web Spider

Web Spider — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:54:24 +0000

So true.

By: Nikky

Nikky — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:13:50 +0000

Agreed. I remember reading an article about a guy whose family was vegetarians, but “non-confrontational” ones, who respect other people’s choices.

He says this one paragraph before mentioning that his 4 year old daughter tells her friends who eat pizza that, “their bodies are graveyards for dead animals.” Wonder where she got that from?

By: Random user

Random user — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:28:03 +0000

More like how people on Youtube think of Chinese whenever a dog is involved.
NOTE THAT I AM NOT TRYING TO BE RACIST. But it’s true. Look up any video with a dog and Chinese. Look at the comments. There.

By: Shane

Shane — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:41:45 +0000

A fundraiser? PeTA opposes no-kill shelters. Apparently the no-kills make PeTA’s kill rate of 95% look bad, so they’re evil.

By: flyingtuhrtle

flyingtuhrtle — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:07:32 +0000

if cooking is animal abuse, then my dad must abuse steak perfectly.

By: Ashleigh

Ashleigh — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:31:07 +0000

Amen.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:49:15 +0000

Amen.

By: megs

megs — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:06:52 +0000

Yeah, because whores and porn stars eat meat for a living!

By: poodle_face

poodle_face — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:18:43 +0000

Where’s the bar for “taking an animal away from its owner, then killing it because PETA have no way of looking after it, and by the way we do this several thousand times a year and yet somehow still have the balls to call our selves ‘ethical’ and look down on everyone else, because obviously forgetting to feed a puppy once is FAR FAR worse than putting it to death”?

By: Kyo

Kyo — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:52:21 +0000

Peta’s doing what they do for a good reason, they’re just going way extremist on it. They just need to lay off a bit.

By: josh

josh — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:49:59 +0000

Wow.. Not correct at all. People need to do their research.

By: bcteagirl

bcteagirl — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:24:51 +0000

Yes, but apparently they would be against AIDS treatments made in the same way. Loads of fun these guys?

By: rowanVT

rowanVT — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:32:47 +0000

Yes. Because clearly you see lions in the wild grazing next to zebras. Their lack of intelligence reaches new levels every day.

By: rowanVT

rowanVT — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:30:41 +0000

someone managed to “debunk” the fact that they euthanise perfectly healthy animals of sound behaviour rather than adopt them out?

By: rowanVT

rowanVT — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:23:18 +0000

I don’t remember where, but I saw a video of one of the high ups honestly saying that it was better for an animal to be dead than to be “a slave”.

By: rowanVT

rowanVT — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:20:26 +0000

It’s actually worse than that. PETA firmly espouses the idea that it is better for an animal to be *dead* than to be a pet. This is why their shelter has a horrendous euthanasia rate. They won’t adopt out animals for the most part.

By: Kevin T.

Kevin T. — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:28:16 +0000

Not a problem, just so long as PETA kills all the domesticated animals before releasing them into the wild.

By: Kevin T.

Kevin T. — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:24:35 +0000

True true.

Just don’t show it in public!

By: anaceofkidneys

anaceofkidneys — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:33:36 +0000

Graph needs a “killing it with illegally obtained barbituates, then dumping the corpse in a dumpster” column, with a “who cares” value. Because that’s how PeTA really gets down.

By: Athanar

Athanar — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:24:33 +0000

I support the idea PeTA has, to raise awareness of animal cruelty and try to take steps toward stopping it, but PeTA is a group of radicals…

By: thatguy

thatguy — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:55:01 +0000

Actually, PETA is for the “complete and total liberation of animals.” The fact that they achieved stricter laws is purely side effect. They’re goal is to make it illegal to EAT or even OWN these animals.

Yeah…they’re freaks.

By: FyreWytch

FyreWytch — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:07:43 +0000

Actually.. Ingrid Newkirk (PeTA’s president) has given out loans to people who firebomb medical facilities and many of their members are also involved with Animal Liberation Front, which IS A TERRORIST GROUP..

Arson is a form of terrorism.. They also harrass the people who work their ass off in shelters because they have to put animals no one is adopting to sleep because irresonsible owners don’t spay and neuter their pets.

Many people who I know and love support the IDEA peta has, of protecting animals… but they don’t actually know what they do.

By: jessica

jessica — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:43:18 +0000

Maybe you should add another Label called “Getting insulin from it” and label it “who cares”. One of the leaders of Peta is a diabetic who needs insulin from animals to survive. Apparently her life is worth more than several hundred animals.