Comments on: Internet communities

By: Quackoid

Quackoid — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:33:44 +0000

Nothing more true than this graph.

By: DrugMonkey

DrugMonkey — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:18:16 +0000

FWDAOTI indeed. About 75.4% of teh Intertoobules

By: I hate crappy stuff

I hate crappy stuff — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:06:04 +0000

I’d say the blue slice where all the crappy stuff is should be much bigger

By: philip

philip — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:46:02 +0000

Porn? P2P movies & music? Wikipedia? Any one of these happens more than dating services.

By: DiabloNeonX

DiabloNeonX — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:31:16 +0000

WTF. Teh actual graph is missing teh Pr0nz!!!

By: lyrmat

lyrmat — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:00:33 +0000

OMFG !!… AWESOMELY TRUE P

By: Arikia

Arikia — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:32:24 +0000

They forgot one major slice: FWDAOTI

By: MNM

MNM — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:06:37 +0000

Thank you, now i know

By: Watwatwut

Watwatwut — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:27:19 +0000

*sob*

By: The_Great_G

The_Great_G — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:41:47 +0000

The slice for embarrassing photos is too small

By: Martin Prince

Martin Prince — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:16:14 +0000

You forgot Twilight.

By: You Bet

You Bet — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:12:40 +0000

There = Referring to place or the like. They’re = They are. Their = Possessive.

I’m guessing it was intentional, now. xP

By: João Campos

João Campos — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:42:44 +0000

No, it’s for porn, always has been, always will be. If you think otherwise, you are wrong.

By: Steven

Steven — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:28:43 +0000

Who’s = Who is. Whose = the possessive . Internet communities are also largely used to correct spelling and grammar. Often, though, the corrector will turn out to be a hypocrite because there own punctuation, spelling, or grammer is wrong.

By: Ilove2learn

Ilove2learn — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:57:06 +0000

I think you’re on Me’s side.
And I disagree with your disagreement with the disagreeing of the disagreetion…wait….
*panics and runs away*

By: Watwatwut

Watwatwut — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:26:34 +0000

I am under the impression that the person who made this graph is a stalker.

By: gentlebum

gentlebum — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:45:27 +0000

she/he didn’t realise that cause she/he was too busy watching porn.

By: s

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:08:20 +0000

“when do whe finally realise that???”

when you read the title of the graph and “realise” that it isn’t talking about the internet… it’s talking about internet community sites.

By: MNM

MNM — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:47:38 +0000

I disagree with you disagreeing with the first disagreer.
Who’s side am I on now? D:

By: youbetcha

youbetcha — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:41:43 +0000

it is for porn ladies and gentleman, when do whe finally realise that???

By: Starlinguk

Starlinguk — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:17:19 +0000

I disagree with your disagree.

By: Me

Me — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:06:04 +0000

I disagree.

By: giskard

giskard — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:52:55 +0000

the bottom graph should just be a solid circle labeled “arguing”.

By: Freud

Freud — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:34:08 +0000

Savant syndrome, sometimes abbreviated as savantism, is not a recognized medical diagnosis, but researcher Darold Treffert describes it as a rare condition in which persons with developmental disorders (including autism spectrum disorders) have one or more areas of expertise, ability or brilliance that are in contrast with the individual’s overall limitations. Treffert says the condition can be genetic, but can also be acquired. According to Treffert, about half of persons with savant syndrome have autistic disorder, while the other half have another developmental disability, mental retardation, brain injury or disease. He says, “… not all autistic persons have savant syndrome and not all persons with savant syndrome have autistic disorder”. Other researchers state that autistic traits and savant skills may be linked, or have challenged some earlier conclusions about savant syndrome as “hearsay, uncorroborated by independent scrutiny”. Though it is even more rare than the savant condition itself, some savants have no apparent abnormalities other than their unique abilities. This does not mean that these abilities weren’t triggered by a brain dysfunction of some sort but does temper the theory that all savants are disabled and that some sort of trade-off is required.

By: SECOND

SECOND — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:21:23 +0000

SECOND and the internet is for porn.

By: FIRST

FIRST — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:15:48 +0000

FIRST!!! ahahahaha