-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous When You Should Start Dating According To | Things at Walmart Next »
Internet communities
» 26 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
gregaaron89 on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Jackal_XIV on Replotted: That’s More L… Jackal_XIV on For When Things Can’t Ge… Jackal_XIV on I Meant to Flag That Spot… Jackal_XIV on This Water Tastes Funny… Jackal_XIV on That’s Why I Only Eat th… Jackal_XIV on Just Cup Your Hands. I’l… Jackal_XIV on Just Cup Your Hands. I’l… Jackal_XIV on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Jackal_XIV on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Reese on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Jackal_XIV on And TV Makes It Look so R… me on The Selfish Internet Meme mrawesome on Hopefully Not in That Ord… partinobodycular on And TV Makes It Look so R… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
FIRST!!! ahahahaha
Savant syndrome, sometimes abbreviated as savantism, is not a recognized medical diagnosis, but researcher Darold Treffert describes it as a rare condition in which persons with developmental disorders (including autism spectrum disorders) have one or more areas of expertise, ability or brilliance that are in contrast with the individual’s overall limitations. Treffert says the condition can be genetic, but can also be acquired. According to Treffert, about half of persons with savant syndrome have autistic disorder, while the other half have another developmental disability, mental retardation, brain injury or disease. He says, “… not all autistic persons have savant syndrome and not all persons with savant syndrome have autistic disorder”. Other researchers state that autistic traits and savant skills may be linked, or have challenged some earlier conclusions about savant syndrome as “hearsay, uncorroborated by independent scrutiny”. Though it is even more rare than the savant condition itself, some savants have no apparent abnormalities other than their unique abilities. This does not mean that these abilities weren’t triggered by a brain dysfunction of some sort but does temper the theory that all savants are disabled and that some sort of trade-off is required.
Nothing more true than this graph.
SECOND and the internet is for porn.
the bottom graph should just be a solid circle labeled “arguing”.
I disagree.
I disagree with your disagree.
I disagree with you disagreeing with the first disagreer.
Who’s side am I on now? D:
I think you’re on Me’s side.
And I disagree with your disagreement with the disagreeing of the disagreetion…wait….
*panics and runs away*
Who’s = Who is. Whose = the possessive . Internet communities are also largely used to correct spelling and grammar. Often, though, the corrector will turn out to be a hypocrite because there own punctuation, spelling, or grammer is wrong.
There = Referring to place or the like. They’re = They are. Their = Possessive.
I’m guessing it was intentional, now. xP
Thank you, now i know
it is for porn ladies and gentleman, when do whe finally realise that???
“when do whe finally realise that???”
when you read the title of the graph and “realise” that it isn’t talking about the internet… it’s talking about internet community sites.
she/he didn’t realise that cause she/he was too busy watching porn.
I am under the impression that the person who made this graph is a stalker.
No, it’s for porn, always has been, always will be. If you think otherwise, you are wrong.
You forgot Twilight.
*sob*
The slice for embarrassing photos is too small
They forgot one major slice: FWDAOTI
OMFG !!… AWESOMELY TRUE
P
WTF. Teh actual graph is missing teh Pr0nz!!!
Porn? P2P movies & music? Wikipedia? Any one of these happens more than dating services.
I’d say the blue slice where all the crappy stuff is should be much bigger
FWDAOTI indeed. About 75.4% of teh Intertoobules