-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Song Content on Kidz Bop | PERCENT OF CRIMES SOLVED Next »
» 136 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
... on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … ... on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Senna on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … oligi3008 on Beheading vs. Balding papajon0s1 on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … ParrotPete on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … FlatFace on Women on the Internet: From My… dolan on And TV Makes It Look so R… FlatFace on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … SimPlus on Forever Unemployed CriticalQuit on Construction Site Hand Si… Ish Kabibble on Beheading vs. Balding Name on Hopefully Not in That Ord… The Bird Nerd on Hopefully Not in That Ord… Vali on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
The one on the right looks like Graham Chapman
http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/050321/151820__mrs_l.jpg
The only difference is that the one on the right likes women…
dude send it to totallylookslike
too cool to be true
My partner is a lesbrarian. No lie.
That’s awesome.
My sister’s a lesbrarian.
So your sister=her lover?! OMG the world is too small!
I am a Lesbrarian!
then you must be a lesbian
O_O
Nice handwriting!
hum… how in the world women like this can say that? lol
I have no clue what the hell you were trying to say, but I’m offended.
lol. Me too.
I’m not, I find your teachings worthy and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
‘Cause we’re people…? O_o Yup, we are humans indeed.
Maybe it’s a coincidence that the graph kindof looks like…nah, it must be a coincidence.
HAHAHA!
“…nah”
XD
And the arrow is pointing at just the right spot, too.
No lie I was thinking that too
ooooh…. wow, i’m slow. lol.
This is from this summer’s Dyke March in Vancouver, BC. Right on, sisters!
Uhh…Dyke? Ouch?
No… it’s called “The Dyke March.” It’s a social concept referred to as ‘reclaiming the name.’ If they call themselves dykes, and make it a humorous, even affectionate nickname, they remove from the word its power to be offensive and cause harm.
Interesting concept. I like it.
It’s been done before. Ever heard of hip-hop?
You, my friend, win at life.
Kinda like how network admins don’t mind being called geeks. As the saying goes – “Geek used to be a four-letter word. Now it’s a six-figure one.”
BS.
I hate this concept. The actual outcome is that the word becomes more popular with everyone– including those that want to be offensive.
In addition, no matter how a word it used currently, you can’t take the etymology and word history away– it will always be there, revealing the truth of the word.
it doesn’t matter though, the “truth of the word” only has meaning to the one using it to harm.
for instance, somebody could call me ANY nickname for a Canadian, and it wouldn’t bother me AT ALL, even if they cover it in disdain. This is because those words are embraced by our culture
all that matters is HOW the word is used, and what it means to the people on the receiving end, hanging onto the history of words only prolongs prejudice
Yes, how it’s used matters. But, as with all insults, if you aren’t offended by them they lose their power. Insults say more about the person doing the insulting than the insulted, if nothing else that the person who insulted you doesn’t like you. But why care what some random person, who is bigoted/moronic, thinks?
Yeah, I don’t really like this concept either.
That’s ridiculous. Then we can’t use “queer” or “gay” or… pretty much any label, because they’ve all been used against us.
They’re ugly as hell, so Im fine with it.
Fat too
They’re not fat or ugly!
I don’t think either of you would know beauty if it smacked you in the face!
Don’t feed the trolls, precious… it only makes them harder to get rid of.
You’ve got to be kidding me. The one on the left has got to be 180. The next one is well over 200. The next one is also around 180. The one on the right might be the thinnest, but the kankles are a dead giveaway. I say close to 170. Now, the oriental one in the background looks kind of cute.
and?
How long did you work at the fair, guessing weights?
What do the supposed kankles give away? Exactly?
My kankles give away that I have rheumatiod arthritis. Otherwise, I’m pretty slim from the kankles on up.
You can’t judge a book by it’s kankles.
And whose face will you be painting on your hand tonight, dearie?
Men like you make me even happier that I’m a dyke!
Things are Oriental, people, however, are Asian. Just so’s you know.
there’s a rug in the background?
dude. one on the left is 140 max
Um, yeah, the point being that they don’t actually give a sh_t what your f_cking opinion is. Unless you’re another lesbian, of course; but I doubt you’re that good in bed.
Indeed. They could be voluptuous redheads in 5″ stiletto heels and lingerie, and they still wouldn’t sleep with him. Calling them fat and/or ugly is just sour grapes at this point.
What about the cute little Asian chick in the back? She’s not ugly at all.
The color scheme is off…
Wait, my Mom has an MLS and worked as a librarian – does that mean I’m gay? Do I have to tell my wife and kids now? Crud.
Yes and yes.
The love which cannot be named above a whisper.
Because you can’t talk with your mouth full?
because they’re librarians, and librarians always make sure you don’t talk above a whisper.
Lesbrarians FTW! I love these grrls!
Alas, no lipstick lesbrarians.
I think they’re cute.
Is not wearing lipstick that uncommon where you come from?
You mean all lesbians don’t look like they just walked off a porn set? Dang, now my whole view of lesbians is ruined
Sorry to burst your horny little bubble.
That’s alright, he burst already…
:p
I’m not either of these “L words” but I love this pic. I see four smart funny women who don’t cater to society’s stupid standards of what a woman should look like. In other words, EPIC WIN.
They are wearing dresses and butterflies though. Not a fan of those things, too typically female. Nobody’s totally unaffected by gender roles, however.
Or maybe they just like dresses and butterflies. Gasp!
There are lesbians who shave their legs and don’t wear overalls all day?!
I’m *shocked* and *appalled*.
(rofl)
But that leads to the question “Why do they like dresses and butterflies?”. What, you don’t think gender roles has anything to do with it?
What exactly are they supposed to wear? Typically ‘male’ clothing?
Or maybe clothes with no cultural influences at all – hmm…plastic bag?
I don’t presume to tell people what to wear. Personally I prefer “male” clothing, though, even on women. But then “male” clothing is more or less unisex nowadays, so it draws less attention to your gender.
You like what you like, though gender roles do shape what we like. The problem is when you do things you don’t like to conform to a gender role. Beyond that it’s just my personal opinion on clothing, which you may ignore if you wish (not like you need to conform to MY opinion either).
Dresses have been reserved for women for a long time now, so I would stay away from dresses if I wanted to avoid gender roles.
I know I personally haven’t wore one since I was a very small child. In the past, all children wore dresses– it made them easier to potty train.
I like dresses and butterflies just as much as any drag queen would simply because they make me feel pretty and more like a woman. Maybe it’s the gender role that makes me feel this way, but I don’t think it’s a bad gender role. Now what I don’t like is that some years ago they made the Easy Bake Oven for little girls to be able to make desserts and things, but now they make something similar “for boys.” The only reason it’s for boys, though, is because it has like slime and stuff like that. I can’t remember the name of this toy off-hand, but I remember it being advertised sometime before Christmas last year. So just because the Easy Bake Oven is pink, a little boy can’t play with it? I know many male aspiring chefs, but this is typically labelled girl’s play. That makes me sick. Dresses and butterflies not so much.
Well, if you like dresses, fine. I don’t. The whole “more like a woman” thing I object to though. You’re either a woman or you’re not. It’s a biological fact, not a matter of degree.
Yeah, butterflies and dresses don’t really add any length to a Y chromosome.
I think you may have meant X.
Well, I’m kind of a tomboy most of the time, so when I dress up, I try to go all out with it because it’s fun to me.
I agreee Failerella!
EPIC WIN!
You sound fat.
You sound bitter.
I agree Failerella! Good for these women for loving who they are and what they do. And for those who say they are fat and ugly? Guess what, they don’t want you either!
Well, they can think those women aren’t attractive, but why does it matter enough to point it out? I never got the need to comment on if a woman is hot or ugly. Yet I find that’s what normal males talk about most when it comes to women.
As an example, I present an exchange I’ve had many times with friends:
Friend: “Hey, did you see that girl?”
Me: “What girl?”
Friend: “That girl who just walked past.”
Me: “No, I wasn’t paying attention.”
Friend: “Well, she was HOT!”
Me: “Uh, okay…”
Awkward silence ensues.
That, and talking about celebrities they find hot, discussing which woman is hotter than the other. I can’t recall a single time I’ve heard a conversation about a female celebrity’s accomplishments/talent or such, though.
Wow. You sound like a blast. Thanks for the downer.
Right, because clearly talking about “hot chicks” is so fun and intellectually stimulating.
What’s not intellectually stimulating is talking about how certain things are not intellectually stimulating. And yes, I do recognize the irony of my statement. Let me put it a different way. What is intellectually stimulating?
Writing books, having serious discussions about issues which actually matter, etc..
Awesome! You write books? I read a lot, so maybe I’ve heard of your stuff. What books have you written?
No, you haven’t heard of them, they aren’t published. It’s a hobby so far…
lesbrarians rock my universe, literally
smart n sexy, with shushes and a glare that make me snap to attention.
You have issues…
AMAZING issues.
I think people need to re-evaluate their concept of “amazing.”
It amazes me that you think that.
nice mental image
3 and 4 should make a porno
I thought the intersection would have been much bigger, if the circles didn’t completely overlap.
Just kiddin’…..
I had no idea there was a name for us! Amazing.
epic win.
I second that WIN
OMG! Just figured out what I want to be when I grow up!
LAWLZ
i’m AJ MOHO and i support this message. WINWINWINWINWIN
This is officially the best thing I’ve seen on GraphJam ever.
what a cute, funny, smart, hot group of women! amazing!
Yes, you know they’re funny and smart from a picture. Moron.
well, you can deduce that at least one of them is funny and smart for having come up with this clever banner. besides, they don’t let just any moron be a librarian, you actually have to have a degree for that.
Well you can infer all those things if you have a brain.
OMFG, that’s funny stuff right there, I tell you what. I don’t care where you from that’s funny right there.
LOVE IT!!! I’m a lesbrarian in Australia. Gotta love that boolean
I guess there’s officially a group for everything, huh?
Well yes, DUH, obvious:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Essential-Classification-Vanda-Broughton/dp/1856045145/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1252678392&sr=1-1
Just what we needed. More sexuality being linked to our profession. First we’re bookish women that are sexually repressed until we take off our glasses and undo our hair. Now “lesbrarians”. Great, just great.
Note- My objection has absolutely nothing to do with sexual orientation.
But to be fair, the entire Lesbian circle is not inside the Librarian Circle. And (if I remember the maths we got taught in the third year juniors, which was a long, long while ago I admit) that suggests that while there are some librarians who are lesbians, there are also librarians (quite a lot of them, based on the positions of the circles) who are not lesbians. In much the same way that while there are some lesbians who are librarians, not every lesbian is a librarian.
So, in short, calm the hell down already.
Yeah, understand that your “critical thinking” and “simple geometry” are well beyond the ability of the average human. John & Jane Doe look at that and say “hurr, lesbrarians, lolz0r!”
I’m a librarian, and male too ! There isn’t a snappy name for a gay librarian is there?
5 year old fruitcake
i tried to think of something but couldnt really get it to work. im sure you can come up with something? start a new group
Me too. The powers of pun are not strong with me today.
You suck.
Pomosexual Librarian?
No! Superhero…
Pomosexual Libraryman! Able to shelve books and fulfill gay stereotypes in a single bound!
I think the only profession that should have sexuality linked to it is prostitution.
lmfao thats fantastic. hmmm, i should get my gf to get a job in the library… she’d be perfect for it… and then i’d have a lesbrarian for myself. yum.
It’s also great that they are perpetuating the stereotype of the librarian that shushes everyone for being too loud.
Stereotype hell. It’s gone. My local library now has children’s activity days during which the place becomes intolerable. I only wish librarians still made everybody STFU.
LOL. Well, it’s what I do every day (schools still have the STFU for the silent reading portion of the English classes
. But, I guess I have to call myself a ‘Queerbrarian’.
Picture provided by the National Lesbrarian Gold-diggers Foundation.
WIN!
Its really an amazing.. I think many of the girls would like to be a member of this community but i am not..
Way to keep a secret ladies, and oh how I wish you had… eww
I was once a lesbrarian assistant. I love this picture. And I am somewhat floored by all the good grammar and spelling (with one or two exceptions) within the comments.
Is that Gina Bellman on the right?
I prefer the name libresbian but I toyed with lesbrarian myself. It sounds a bit too much like I collect lesbians though!
Love the graph and the girls though. Glad I’m one of many!