-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Level of Dedication Vs Kind of Boyfriend | My life story: Next »
» 65 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
Ish Kabibble on Beheading vs. Balding Name on Hopefully Not in That Ord… The Bird Nerd on Hopefully Not in That Ord… Vali on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … viuff on Never Unfunny mikypeg on Just Cup Your Hands. I’l… mikypeg on I Guess I Shouldn’t Have… mikypeg on Beheading vs. Balding mikypeg on Construction Site Hand Si… SonicLover on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … arc on So You’re Playing Diablo… katie on Women on the Internet: From My… keithybabes on Beheading vs. Balding John on Construction Site Hand Si… cantab on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
CoreyCaffeine wants to know if there is Mudkipz porn!?!?
You have no idea.
Ready normal people?
Lol… An Avenue Q reference. (And in anyone else knows what I’m talking about… +5 Brownie points. )
READY!
Google “furries”….better yet, don’t.
well of course!! http://www.halolz.com/2008/07/16/so-i-herd-u-liek-mudkips/
You forget rule 35: If there isn’t yet porn of it, /b/ will soon make it.
(Something to that effect. Sorry, my brain is on power saver mode today)
Yes, because forgetting rules makes me a homosexual.
How logical and not broad-brushing at all.
Lurk maor.
I don’t lurk. I spend my time on PK, bashing trolls and generally earning my title as TROGDOR: THE BURNINATOR OF PUNDITKITCHEN.
hehe
Iggler doesn’t jest, Devy- I was knighted at our roast-out.
Dontcha just love strongbad?
I wasn’t laughing b/c I thought you weren’t serious. I was laughing b/c I’m glad you bash trolls.
But, this is GraphJam, not Punditkitchen.
This is! GETTING OLD!!!!!!!
Not you… That joke. But yeah. This is no Punditkitchen boy! No Punditkitchen!
Forgetting rule #s makes you a cigarette.
It makes me deadly? Well, I guess I can go along with that one.
That’s the best response I’ve read all day!
“If no porn of it can be found, YOU shall create it”
RULES 1 AND 2, GOD DAMMIT!!
THEY ONLY COUNT DURING RAIDS- THE RULES: LEARN THEM, UNDERSTAND THEM, FFS.
I never thought that household furniture would turn me on…
…let alone ceiling fans.
Which cheated on the toaster with the mini-fridge.
Who was harboring an orgy of inter racial soda pops being filmed by the milk.
who was on break from filming the ever-popular “safe sex”
Actually, shouldn’t the second bar be taller than the first? There’s quite a bit of porn about stuff that doesn’t exist.
Mmmmm.
Unicorns.
However, the literature and myths exist, therefore the porn must exist based upon those myths.
See?
Now we’re getting existential. Yes, the literature is real, but that only implies the existence of porn describing really hot sex with the Wikipedia entry on unicorns. Porn involving the unicorn itself would be in a different category.
16TH!!
You are worth less than herpes.
4chan sucks.
it does
So does your mom.
I have yet to see porn of a Cliff Racer.
Rule 34 has been proven wrong.
Also; I asked someone on /r/ to make some over a year ago
No results
rule 35 shall take effect in 3… 2… 1
chuck norris is the only exception.
thats not true. There’s no Rose Kennedy porn. Look it up if you don’t believe me
rule 35 shall take effect in 3… 2… 1
(Adds 13th Tally)
Close
things that exist: ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
theres porn of : ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
if this is true, a venn diagram would be better suited to illustrate this truth.
I agree; it needs to be a Venn Diagram.
Anybody else remember a show called “Bump In The Night”? Well after a night of heavy drinking I decided I would test rule 34, I found no porn of it! But I know, that one day, the last of my cherished childhood memories shall become a masturbation workout for some 50 year old pedophile. *sigh*
But… what about… THE GAME. There’s no porn of that. Therefor it does not exist. That, or Rule 34 has been disproven. Either way, you all lost and I all won.
beat THAT.
Actually, there’s a lot of porn for it. ED Rule 34. There’s at least 5 or so images there, not to mention if you request it, they shall deliver.
But good win.
I declare a rule 34 on this graph.
Except Shaq-Fu for some odd reason.
Rule 35 shall take effect in 3… 2… 1…
what is this i dont even
no exceptions
the graphs are not at the same hight! should be disabled
The bar for “things that exist” needs to be just a little higher than “things there is porn of”…Rule 35 exists for a reason.
1 & 2 apply to everything.
This graph is so true.
Graphjam has hit a new low.
I come back after an interlude of crappy graphs hoping to be pleasently surprised and this is what I get? A graph about /b/?
Then we have various btards yelling RULEZ 1 AND 2 and to top the cake, we have one up there who first yells ONE AND TWO and then begins discussing /b/ in subsequent comments.
Graphjam, we had a good run, but I think it is time for you to leave my feeds.
You and the person everyone’s yelling at are the only ones who have mentioned it…Nobody else has said it in any of the comments. Talking about 4chan and talking about *that* are two different things.
the butt-hurt is strong tonight
hmmm… i wonder…
I will test this rule out…
Requesting Rule 34 on Rosie O’Donnell, NAOW.
XKCD diserves to die for this
then again i luve xkcd
QWANTZ FOREVER
The porn bar should be greater than the existence bar imo, but I guess it depends on your definition of existence.
You should have made them flesh-colored.
Is there GraphJam porn?
I DEMAND it.