Comments on: Why I am Going to Become a Cat Lady

By: Madlerpal

Madlerpal — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:30:16 +0000

So, you realize this means you’re attracted to gay men and men in reationships that you’ve never met…right?

By: theninjapenguin

theninjapenguin — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:26:29 +0000

Sounds like my high school chem I and II teacher <3

By: cooyo!

cooyo! — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:14:28 +0000

the red does to serve a purpose. it shows that no men that she is attracted to are attracted to her. As for the other two, basically they show that she is attracted to some gay an relationshiped (?) men. I think that this graph is fine and awesome.

By: aaaaaah!

aaaaaah! — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:05:54 +0000

i thought that it meant that there are people that shes never met, but has seen, that she was attracted to. also celebs

By: the other guy

the other guy — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:48:13 +0000

Or celebrities.

By: skystrider

skystrider — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:13:24 +0000

yes, you are taking it FAR too seriously.

By: burningled

burningled — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:38:39 +0000

Those are men she would be attracted to if she met them =P

By: Forkatude

Forkatude — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:38:43 +0000

Yes, but then again, there should be an overlap of just about everything, because gay men in committed relationships could be creeps and losers anyhoo.

By: Lyssy

Lyssy — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:08:55 +0000

Maybe she means the type of men she’s attracted to. That’s how I interpreted it.

By: flieroflight

flieroflight — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:12:38 +0000

i hope your a girl

By: Linaeve

Linaeve — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:28:06 +0000

So true.

By: Super Aardvark

Super Aardvark — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:44:51 +0000

What if just my asshole is tingling?

By: Super Aardvark

Super Aardvark — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:42:57 +0000

What are you talking about? Science IS fun.

By: dontwantaname

dontwantaname — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:21:49 +0000

notice hows there is a little sliver mixing the “gay men and man i am attracted too” >.>

still funny graph thou

By: Nickel

Nickel — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:22:46 +0000

Whoa! Hey now, that was completely uncalled for.

There’s one thing that annoys me about this web site: these graphs were made for fun, and everyone seems to forget that!

Seriously, this was obviously meant as a cute, playful joke. Kindly remember this the next time your asshole instincts are tingling. >:(

By: musiCat85

musiCat85 — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:12:48 +0000

Way to read way too much into this joke. But I suppose when you look for reasons to be offended, you can indeed be offended by just about anything.

By: ...

... — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:46:52 +0000

Lady, noone finds you attractive. Remove the green circle.

Fatty.

By: cassi

cassi — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:14:12 +0000

This is an off shoot of i can has cheeze burger so it is really about having lots of cuddly cats to love later in life. Don’t be so critical people it is cute and fun not life changing.

By: Mira8

Mira8 — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:05:00 +0000

sadly, this is so very very true…

By: TheCake

TheCake — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:07:47 +0000

This person sure has met a LOT of men who are not in a serious relationship. In fact, most of the men she has met is not creepy, or gay. But also apparently not attractive. Conclusion:

She will become a cat woman because she is lesbian.

By: amusememusically

amusememusically — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:56:23 +0000

There needs to be a separate subsection for ex-boyfriends. Ones you’d take back, and ones that would take you back. They should be completely enclosed within the Men I’ve Met category. And there should be no overlap.

By: anaranjada

anaranjada — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:15:19 +0000

But there are men out there whom you WOULD be attracted to, but you haven’t met (because, geez, it’s a big world). I think that’s what it’s insinuating…

By: anaranjada

anaranjada — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:12:50 +0000

Same here =\

By: Priestdaddy

Priestdaddy — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:35:27 +0000

The proportions seem pretty accurate to you?

The way I read it she has meet about 1/3 of all gay men in the world. She has met about six times the number of men than there are gay men in the world.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:33:51 +0000

Good call

By: Max Chaplin

Max Chaplin — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:43:35 +0000

OR, you could have “men who are attracted to me” contained in “creeps and losers”, which would make the graph maker seem a lot less insane.

By: trixie

trixie — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:17:31 +0000

Must be late. What I meant to say was since there’s so many people trying to ridicule the creator about the actual diagram, we should discuss that. That’s what I get for typing after bedtime!

By: trixie

trixie — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:14:57 +0000

Well, since you want to take the joke out of the joke, let’s discuss this.

If you want to take it literally as a Venn diagram, everything outside is the (U)niverse, thus, every man that has never been seen nor met falls into that area. The circles include all the possibilities of (U) excluding men that have not been seen nor met. On the more complicated Venn diagrams I’ve worked with, and tortured my students with. In these diagrams X can intersect with A, yet Y is neither inclusive to X nor inclusive to A, yet intersects both X and A. This creates a rather interesting anomaly in some of the more radical areas of physics. Or perhaps your more of a strictly ‘if you can see it, it must be’ physicist.

What typos? Criticize more precisely.

By: net

net — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:54:33 +0000

Ya gotta be a girl with really crappy ‘man luck’ or ‘girl luck.’

You gotta have been told mean things like ‘there’s not enough beers in the world to make me have dinner with you’, only to have it recanted when the person realizes you were asking if he was attending the company picnic, not going on a date. And of course, you aren’t supposed to be pissed and be all chummy with that person later, ‘if you want to keep your job.’

Get to that place, hon, and this chart makes all the sense in the world.

By: net

net — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:49:45 +0000

They fall into the creeps and lodrt circle that’s outside the men met circle. Hee hee.

By: net

net — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:47:51 +0000

OMG! Really? You don’t know how someone could be attracted to someone they’ve never actually met face to face? Think magazines models, or Laucha Libre wrestlers, or hot Bollywood actors/actresses. You see them, they look hot, but you have not met them. Sadly, the attraction is one way. *sigh* Therefore, they must go outside the men met circle. Simple and sadly.

By: trixie

trixie — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:40:24 +0000

Let me guess. You’re a man. In a relationship. Get lucky often. Thinks a self make-over actually attracts people. Truly believes beauty is within, but would never, ever be caught dead in public with someone large than him, or not as attractive. Doesn’t like the scarecrow look of runway models, but thinks the bods in Playboy or Playgirl are hot however unrealistic.

And you can’t see the ironic joke in this diagram?

By: net

net — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:33:15 +0000

I hope that’s a rhetorical joke…

By: net

net — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:30:32 +0000

Hmm… If I were to alter this, I think the men attracted to me would be smaller, about the size of a pinhead. And the men I’m attracted to would be larger, and men I’ve actually met would be ginormous! Like off the page.

I’m right there with you. I too will grow into the cat lady and the police will find me dead, with a gazzillion still well fed cats. … Becuase I’d have a gazzillion well fed hamsters at the time of my death too.

By: crystal

crystal — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:26:51 +0000

Haha how sad

By: Gibsoncat9

Gibsoncat9 — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:48:45 +0000

So gay men can’t be in committed relationships? What the hell. This graph is blatantly discriminatory and I, for one, am offended. You, ma’am, are the reason that hate perpetuates itself in our society. You should be ashamed. Ashamed.

By: ambroseCollector

ambroseCollector — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:26:13 +0000

No gay men are in committed relationships!?

Wow, my life is about to take a major turn downhill.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:37:09 +0000

I have to wonder why she’s only met around 10% of the men she’s attracted to? Weeeiiiird!

By: papajon

papajon — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:55:57 +0000

Sorry, this is way too confusing. Venn diagram size fail, typo fail, confusing interesections; You know, work on yourself first, hon. If you get happy with you then you don’t need kind of graph.

By: Naoyusimi

Naoyusimi — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:44:59 +0000

Yeah, the women’s attitudes are kinda “c’est la vie”, but the men seem to get nasty and insulting.

Well, perhaps I’m assuming the nasty and insulting ones are men . . . hmm. Wouldn’t they be the ones who might take it personally? Yeah, I think so.

By: Claire

Claire — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:36:56 +0000

I agree with this graph!

By: Lam

Lam — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:49:29 +0000

This is a factual graph that all woman can relate to.

By: Palpz

Palpz — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:37:26 +0000

I just think it’s a fallacy to assume that the “Creeps and losers” portion of this graph would never intersect the “Men in committed relationships” portion.

By: Ant

Ant — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:30:06 +0000

The circle encompasses “all” as in “all the men I have ever met”.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:09:18 +0000

Heh, post it here and suddenly, it’s no longer fun.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:08:42 +0000

Pretty sure they explain why some of the men she has met are not ideal. The problem, if you ask me, and I know you didn’t, is the part of the “men i have ever met” circle that doesn’t intersect with anything else. Is it an empty set? If so, cool.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:45:18 +0000

You a disgruntled suitor?

By: Alys

Alys — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:40:56 +0000

I think it’s an excellent graph just as it is – hardly “goofed up”. The proportions seem pretty accurate to me. And I have two cats already!

By: AMG

AMG — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:35:53 +0000

penny lopey.
.
Sorry couldn’t help myself.

By: Penelopi

Penelopi — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:34:53 +0000

welcome to the creeps and losers circle. *cheer*