-
-
Copy & paste this:
-
Latest Comments
Exodiafinder687 on Probability Someone Will Insul… JoeL on High on Life? No, High on… Exodiafinder687 on Re-Plotted: Problem, Flame… Exodiafinder687 on I Swear to God If You Don… Exodiafinder687 on I Swear to God If You Don… zak on So Many Countless Hours Spent … CaioNV on Proof That Women Are Evil… Starlancer on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Malkiot on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Malkiot on So Many Countless Hours Spent … meh on Replotted- Pol·i·ti·cian: A Pe… Chris on So Many Countless Hours Spent … mwah on Replotted: That’s Just… Mr. Wayne on So Many Countless Hours Spent … tehrawb on High on Life? No, High on… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
32 nd
Hey Homer, remember when graphs were funny?
I’m not the person you were speaking to….but I do faintly remember graphs being funny…..sometimes looking at the first couple pages of graph jam is fun.
Actually now that I’m seeing the old ones again, those really aren’t that funny either. I guess it was the middle that was best. 0_o
None of them are pee your pants funny. It’s just that when you first started reading them, it was such a new idea. Now you read them out of habit. Soon, you’re going to see them on sitcoms. The guys on Big Bang Theory being the first ones to likely mention it.
All our base are belong to them anyway.
Sitcoms are where memes go to die.
Sitcoms are pretty much fail nowadays anyway.
The only graph that comes to mind where I actually laughed out loud was the first time I saw that Rick Astley graph…
You forgot:
“When your buddy sent you porn at work and your boss happens to be walking into your office”: 100%
Your buddy sends you gay porn? You have a boss?
Sounds like someone drinks from the river of suck.
You know you just added “gay”, which wasn’t in the original comment.
What’s Freud trying to tell you?
You know you added “u” in “Fred,” which wasn’t in the original comment. What’s Todd trying to tell you?
Once I was talking about Freud with a friend, and a guy who overheard us said, “Didn’t he get mauled by a tiger?” Apparently, he mistook Sigmund Freud for Seigfreid (sp?) and Roy. FAIL.
ZOMG I ROFLED
It’s terrible when the comments are funnier than the graphs! I had to re-read the original to see it was from “Fred.”
we were talkin abou utube here ;P
but with other vid sites, true i guess XD
This is actually one of the most true graphs in a while.
After 2 minutes of waiting on the video to buffer, I press refresh, just as the video starts loading.
LOL!
I feel your pain.
it’s because you press the refresh button, if you wouldn’t have hit it, it would’ve stayed the same… it’s not like it would’ve worked if you had just waited that second.., so don’t feel sad.
Damn straight, and embedded videos are even more painful.
It’s called a cache, morons. Increase your browser’s memory allocation.
Fail graph is fail.
sum(all probability in this graph) must be < or = 100%. not the case. wahhhh.
Yes, that was the problem I have with this graph! The author has a poor concept of probability considering that none of these can occur simultaneously. Thus, it must add up to < or = 100%!
Actually, I was thinking maybe it was that each is individual, so the chances of it loading when this happens. then the chances of it loading when something else happens.
SO TRUE