-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Fear of Swine Flu vs. Knowledge | tastiness vs area of sandwich Next »
» 56 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
unnamed on Eeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrr Amy Pond on Well, When They’re Rappi… Nathan on Classic: The Hips Aren’t… Perdita Durango on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… Gimpy on High on Life? No, High on… domerdaver on At Least It’s Origi… domerdaver on At Least It’s Origi… YourAnIdiot on High on Life? No, High on… Dash Vader on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… dutch07 on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… Nerdymcnerd on I Swear to God If There Is One… Nerdymcnerd on High on Life? No, High on… ZPowers on Scariest Thing Ever! Derpington on I Know That Fez, Bro Marloin on High on Life? No, High on… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
FIRST !
worst!
LURST!
WURST!
…sorry, I’m hungry.
THIRST!
Summer time….
BURST?
BOOM!
nursed
(Fred) DURST!!!11!1
CURSED!
HEARSE’D!
It’s how you “Punk’d” dead people
COMBO BREAKER
lol nice dude
Shopped. I am so sick of seeing photoshopped images on this site.
I lol’d
Simple but full of win.
Yep, and the “Things Twittered” circle could be changed to “All things Web 2.0″ for me.
i feel like graph jam is part of 2.0… yet here you are.
Oh really? Where’s the “interactive” part where I get to advertise what I’m doing all the time. And where’s my profile where I get to advertise my resume, interests, and other bs that has no place on a public forum?
I do believe there were entertainment sites that allowed comments before linkedin, cloud computing, myspace, facebook, etc…ad infinitum.
Web 2.0 is user generated content, be it a profile page, or graph’s n lolcat’s.
You just described Social networking, which is but a part of Web 2.0.
So what was Web 1.0 before it became commercialised, if not user-generated? I remember the early days in 95-96 when the web wasn’t about people trying to sell you stuff, but people sharing their enthusiams and communicating with each other = social networking.
It’s not the web that’s moved on, just the tools, although it seems that the average age of users has descended just as rapidly.
if you dont like it, theres always parcheesi
Yet here we are…socializing. On the web.
More specifically, here YOU are, sharing your opinions about things…which nobody asked for…on the web. In a social manner.
You might as well have tweeted this, Perry…just saying…
The ironic thing is the “Follow Graph Jam on Twitter!” right below the graph. >_>
I guess he’s saying that he doesn’t care about his own graph. *shrug*
Haha!
Twitter is so stupid. That’s why I call everyone I know to tell them what I’m doing, in quick, ten second statements.
hey, me too!
I know, do regular people honestly expect others to “follow” them? It’s kind of creepy, actually.
I decree that henceforth, those who twitter will be referred to as “Twits”
I second the motion, most wholeheartedly.
I third it.
And in accordance to Decree UAV, people who were former twitters will now be called “Twats”
Twits and twats… simply brilliant.
That’s what I call’em already… but I always called “twatter” to the thing.
tewtelly rite awn…….tscharraaah
King UAV….
your decree noted
how about
adding little twitterers as
“Twitlings”
YORKLE
I cared about basement dad.
Haha yes! Sometimes you just need to share your thoughts in an outlet where no one is expected to care what you say, but at least there’s a possibility of someone reading it.
get a friend, one that isn’t digital
You seem confused… Allow me to clarify:
Twitter is for sharing thoughts with friends (digital or real) when you don’t expect anyone to actually care what you say. Real life is for talking to friends about things they want to talk about.
If I somehow insinuated that I have no friends in real life, I apologize for leading you to believe that someone else in the world was as pitiful as you are. Hope that clears things up! Have a splendid day! =)
successful troll is successful
Successful troll comment is now successfully twittered!
Win. Twitter is stupid.
I agree. So is MySpace, Facebook, and all that social networking crap.
Left circle should be labeled “This graph.”
(I hadn’t realized Twitter had reached the “it’s now cooler to hate it than love it” phase in society. I should start making snarky comments about it, apparently?)
Twitter = American Idol. It was never cool, never clever, never any great monument to American ingenuity, nothing, no, not ever. Just because a bunch of f*cking idiots like to use it and talk about it doesn’t mean it’s valid culture.
Agreed.
I second that
Amen. Hence the “follow” function, so you only read communications from people you’re interested in. Some of these people act like Twitter shot their dog and stole their Bible.
Truth.
There is a surprising number of people commenting that have clearly never used Twitter and are clearly ignorant to it’s actual beneficial uses. I mainly follow companies that interest me and local groups, organisations and news feeds that allow me to stay up to date. Yes, Twitter is full of bullsh*t but only if you seek it out. Research something before you crap all over it.
I will crap on whatever I please, thank you.
Yay! A venn diagram that is correctly made
It took awhile, but I knew you all could do it
I totally don’t get the hatred of Twitter and people who use it. If you don’t like it, nobody’s forcing you to read or use it. How anyone can muster that much negative emotion about something that’s pretty easy to avoid and ignore is beyond me.
TRUE DAT!!
Hey, they’re mutually exclusive!