-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Reasons that Nine Inch Nails are touring with Jane’s Addiction this summer | Reasons for slowdowns on the freeway: Next »
» 22 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
natalie on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … flonkertonchamp on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … FlonkertonChamp on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Penny Rivers on Fake Ass Rapper, or Just Fake… CataclysmMansion on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Silent on So You’re Playing Diablo… sibumpkin on The Cost Is Nothing Compared t… Captain Oblivious on If Only They Had, Like, Made I… sibumpkin on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Ed on Women on the Internet: From My… Claymore on So You’re Playing Diablo… tereglith on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … tereglith on Portion Sizes Have Grown, and … Josh on Top 10 Read Books Radman on So You’re Playing Diablo… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
Astute observation!
Depends on what sort of ‘fun’ you’re using them for. Sticking them in the freezer and chucking them at people? That puts the ‘fun’ in ‘Fun Size’ for me!
wouldn’t it be funner to freeze a king size butterfinger and throw it at someone?
It’s bigger, so it will hurt more.
Fun size would have a smaller surface area, so more pressure would be pinpointed. It’s the science that makes knives work.
That and you can fit more of the small ones in the freezer. More ammo!
If a small volume of something is supposed to be called ‘fun size’, then shouldn’t the people in 3rd world countries be extremely happy, with all the food they’re not having? Then why are we ruining their good moods with food?
Really. V.S.?
w.t.f.
Agreed, “fun size” definitely is NOT a fun size.
since when is travel size larger than normal size? guess it depends on what you’re working with…
Agreed. I think travel size is always smaller than normal size. Other than that, funniest graph in a while.
*and therefore less fun* (lest I be accused of missing the point.)
Fun size is the c*ck tease of the candy world.
ZOMG INNUENDO!
Hahahahaha.
I lolled =)
Haha, way too f*cking true! I’ve always hated the dishonesty behind the fun size. It’s not f*cking fun when it’s so f*cking small! King size should be renamed fun size, or maybe fun king size.
I always call the ones smaller than fun size, ecstasy size. Y’know, the Snickers that is one cubic centimeter. The smaller the more fun!!
Oh, this is so funny! For years, I’ve been asking how *that* is considered “fun size”? To me, fun size is the size of the entire bag.
In the immortal words of Strong Bad, “Fun size? What’s fun about getting less candy?”
It appears to me that the amusement of candy is inversely proportinal to the naming of the product.
May that NOT be a lesson.
Don’t blame us Physics Students. it was the engineers who done it… honest
Exactly. What’s so fun about less candy?
sadly, that’s very true.
now to grab a king-sized Mr. Big!