sometimes I visualize myself holding a child’s birthday cake hostage, sitting in the hot tub with all my clothes on, and eating it with only my face. and you should see me after a breakup…..
The graph title says likelihood of eating an entire tub or ice cream. That means that there should be a probability on the Y axis, e.g. after a breakup 0.3 (30%) chance of eating an entire tub.
Instead the graph maker labeled the axis tubs eaten, implying that after a breakup they would eat 0.3 tubs.
…Besides this graph’s obvious overall fail, I thought it was “Likeliness?” Shouldn’t the Y then be the odds of eating 1 tub* of iced cream, not quantity?
.
*We also have no idea how large a tub to MicheleC (the graphmaker) is. The ¼-gal., sobfest kind, the 1-gal., mass-produce kind, or a college-bet bathtub’s worth.
If you diet, don’t diet, and then diet again, your just going to get fatter then you were before going on the first diet. I haven’t lost or gained weight and yet I have never dieted intentionally.
Ice cream? I don’t do it much for dessert either.
Now, what about cookies and cake?
sometimes I visualize myself holding a child’s birthday cake hostage, sitting in the hot tub with all my clothes on, and eating it with only my face. and you should see me after a breakup…..
heck, i do that all the time
cookies first.
THIRD!!!
nobody will listen to you, cause you are nobody.
You just nullified your own statement. Paradox much?
Fission Mailed anyone?
I’m listening…
Haha.
So true.
Navel gazing much? This is like me making a graph about how often I scratch my ass.
Graph fail
The likelihood of eating an entire tub after a breakup is 0.3 tubs eaten? Close, but not quite
0.31 tubs?
Oh, wait yeah I see the issue too.
i don’t
pls explain
The graph title says likelihood of eating an entire tub or ice cream. That means that there should be a probability on the Y axis, e.g. after a breakup 0.3 (30%) chance of eating an entire tub.
Instead the graph maker labeled the axis tubs eaten, implying that after a breakup they would eat 0.3 tubs.
The title and axis label don’t work together.
Second problem is the title. It says “likeliness” not “likelihood”. Engrish?
Yep. This is a cross-breed between Graph,Fail, and Engrish.
was this graph created by Kathy?
3 tubs when stoned
…if not, in fact, four.
i was just going to ask where the fourth bar was. you know, the one titled “when i am baked.”
Wouldn’t that be a Baked Alaska?
…Besides this graph’s obvious overall fail, I thought it was “Likeliness?” Shouldn’t the Y then be the odds of eating 1 tub* of iced cream, not quantity?
.
*We also have no idea how large a tub to MicheleC (the graphmaker) is. The ¼-gal., sobfest kind, the 1-gal., mass-produce kind, or a college-bet bathtub’s worth.
i consider only a gallon to count, personally. it’s how the champions eat their ice cream.
Ah, a fellow Nazi of the Grammar type. Nice to meet you.
If you diet, don’t diet, and then diet again, your just going to get fatter then you were before going on the first diet. I haven’t lost or gained weight and yet I have never dieted intentionally.
Wow, did I manage to type that whole thing without one spelling error?
No.
And ladies and gentlemen…
thisiswhyyourefat.com
yeah…think on that.
i’ll eat it in any situation
AAH Zombie outbreak… where’s that ice cream
I like ice cream.
I love ice cream and take any time.
Eveytime………