Comments on: According To Charles Dickens

By: buttercup

buttercup — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:33:52 +0000

lol very funny. In school we always called him Darles Chickens and the Sale of Two Titties. If you don’t get that joke or this graph you are either 9 years old or a failure.

By: Idoexist

Idoexist — Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:50 +0000

Or Sophomore English…

By: Flower

Flower — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:27:21 +0000

Hahaaaaaaa this is great. Definitely one of my favorite ones on here.

By: Zera

Zera — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:09:05 +0000

Fail-age ><

By: RoyBatty

RoyBatty — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:16:31 +0000

You’ll have to wait until you get to Junior year English class…

By: RoyBatty

RoyBatty — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:15:24 +0000

Excellent, excellent.

So what if the dumbasses from the back of the class don’t get it.

By: Thorir

Thorir — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:09:58 +0000

Fantastic graph! One of the few that actually represents an intellectual side. Kudos!

By: follie

follie — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:51:15 +0000

Excellent.

WIN!

By: Chels

Chels — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:42:57 +0000

fourthed!

By: Chels

Chels — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:41:44 +0000

duhh

By: elissa

elissa — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:44:00 +0000

Grammar fail.

Circles contain things that are [blank].
By being within the circles, “It” by default exists. Thus, no “was” necessary. Existence is a given.

By: Jason

Jason — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:33:43 +0000

get a life jerk

By: SOPH

SOPH — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:13:14 +0000

That’s Ruyard Kipling, dumbass.

By: jl5691426

jl5691426 — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:53:50 +0000

Thirded – I didn’t read down this far before posting my reply to that comment.

By: jl5691426

jl5691426 — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:49:30 +0000

No, it’s being within both circles says that it is part of both sets. No “was” is necessary.

By: Cordwainer Jones

Cordwainer Jones — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:35:21 +0000

The Segway?

By: mac

mac — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:30:57 +0000

Seconded

By: in_a_box

in_a_box — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:02:06 +0000

I like it! Win! And there is no need to put “was” in the middle, as it is assumed that whatever is central is/was part of both.

By: Persphone

Persphone — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:50:09 +0000

The best of times… are when I’m alone with you

By: KaBooM

KaBooM — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:26:10 +0000

No. You are just an uncultured, uneducated idiot. Educate yourself, then come back with a valid opinion.

By: Dex

Dex — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:04:33 +0000

Thirded?

By: anon

anon — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:59:21 +0000

Should be “How it was” in the middle.

By: PornStoreChick

PornStoreChick — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:31:45 +0000

Wow.. someone who made a music/culture graph. Kudos to you.

By: RJ

RJ — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:26:35 +0000

YES!

By: mr moneygrabs

mr moneygrabs — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:24:07 +0000

Five bucks says no.

By: papajon

papajon — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:50:09 +0000

I’m told since I am a guy “it” automatically refers to sex… ..even though I’ve been in Information Technology for longer than most posters here are old.

And oh.. sure… someone makes a reference to a classic author and that’s stupid! Go back to your reality TV! Go back to your “restate the common and obvious’ graphs! Go on! Get back in there! Git!

By: CM Burns

CM Burns — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:12:19 +0000

It was the best of times, it was the…BLURST of times?! Stupid monkey!

By: Clefaria

Clefaria — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:54:16 +0000

Stupid.

By: fubuki

fubuki — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:39:42 +0000

I agree that Information Technology is both the best and worst of times.

By: whitey138

whitey138 — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:37:37 +0000

kinda clever…just kinda

By: Zee

Zee — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:32:05 +0000

I heard somewhere around here that IT knocks.

By: Firefalcon

Firefalcon — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:25:26 +0000

seconded

By: Bubbaloo

Bubbaloo — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:20:07 +0000

Should be “It was” in the middle. =/

By: Kennedy

Kennedy — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:10:02 +0000

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…