Wait.. are they saying ‘I’m’ there? Damn! How did they know? Actually, I’m so much farther away than that red button… I should make a graph about this graph.
Aha! The proximity of the “you are here” set to the interlinked sets of “athletic,” “funny,” and “intelligent” has nothing to do with how nearly (or not) “you” fits the qualifications of “athletic,” “funny,” or “intelligent!”
If you added a “papajon” set to this graph, placing it anywhere outside of the interlinked sets would accomplish your goal of showing how athletically inept, relentlessly boring and woefully simpleminded you are.
According to my family, I’m between pink and green. To me, I’m half inside of the overlap and half outside of it. Nowhere inside the blue, though. I’d like to be. But I’m not. Oh well
WHO are here?
you, apparently
Well, if the creator if this graph lacks athletic abilities, clearly it is him.
You, sir, win.
Beat me to it!
Boy, the irony of this graph is off the charts.
.
.
.
(Off the charts, geddit?)
OH YOU.
wat
Lol very funnnnnnnyyyyy…
GENERIC COMMENT IS GENERIC.
oooh, i see what you did there
Well that is not fair. You sir, have never even met me.
also the graph maker is outside the big three sets.
i’m there!
There’s a point to this graph in there somewhere. I can just feel it!
We shall form a search party!
I’m on it!
Me too!
You forgot good looking, and rich, and…
Actually, it’s daddy’s rich, and mommies good looking.
Or is that a song?
“Your daddy’s rich, and your momma’s good lookin’” is from Summertime (but you probably already knew that and I’m just being an ass, lol)
I’m not there…I’m farther out!
Yeah me too… we’re so far out!!!!!
lol
that was terrible
Wait.. are they saying ‘I’m’ there? Damn! How did they know? Actually, I’m so much farther away than that red button… I should make a graph about this graph.
Aha! The proximity of the “you are here” set to the interlinked sets of “athletic,” “funny,” and “intelligent” has nothing to do with how nearly (or not) “you” fits the qualifications of “athletic,” “funny,” or “intelligent!”
If you added a “papajon” set to this graph, placing it anywhere outside of the interlinked sets would accomplish your goal of showing how athletically inept, relentlessly boring and woefully simpleminded you are.
Just because you’re not funny doesn’t mean you’re not interesting. There’s plenty of things I find interesting that I don’t find funny.
it does say YOU, not ME!
i think this would make a good t-shirt…
Now I may be an idiot, but there is one thing I am not, sir, and that, sir, is an idiot.
/wrist
awwww
Now I have a sad.
Tim?
Oh look! You made a graph about yourself!
WIN
I think Athletic should be replaced by Good looking…
Then this would be the perfect blow off graph. Just email it to someone after a date.
I believe there is generally a lot more overlap between funny and intelligent than shown in this graph.
uh, thanks, i don’t come to graphjam to get torn apart
expect slightly less patronage from me
I think I’m in the purple. I am no way near the green though. I not have the funnies.
According to my family, I’m between pink and green. To me, I’m half inside of the overlap and half outside of it. Nowhere inside the blue, though. I’d like to be. But I’m not. Oh well
Darn my hasty finger. I meant to put a period at the end of that “Oh well.” Forgive my fail.
i am indeed
I fall right into the “Intelligent” and “Funny” category.
*drags the “You are here” circle to between the red and green circles* Lol that’s me
I’m in the hazelish part.
I didn’t know your name was You. That’s an awfuly wierd name.