Graph by Sunil S
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Real 3D Chocolate Pie Chart | People you meet on the Web Next »
» 75 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
tehrawb on High on Life? No, High on… The Master on Replotted: That’s Just… The Master on So Many Countless Hours Spent … RCC on It’s Just For Show Kitten on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… cheezies on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Moiz Siddiqui on Crapping Has Never Been More… Abcde F. Ghij on If Only They Made Little Pouch… SHOTGUN CHUCK on High on Life? No, High on… JV1138 on The Scoop on Poop Gallade475 on Classic: The Hips Aren’t… headedtoaussie on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… Skye on High on Life? No, High on… Green on The Phallic Graph of Phal… Sosij on If Only They Made Little Pouch… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
This is plagiarism, and this graph has been around the net for years.
Very, very, very poor showing, OP. If you can’t be creative, don’t pretend. What, you think with 400 million people on the net, not one would notice?
Still… it’s awesome. (not OP)
I haven’t seen it; it’s new to me!
Still looks like a penis.
wow good for you
zone of PAIN
L M M O
A Y O F
U U F
G T
H H
I see it! D:
LOL (and thanks I needed a good LOL right about now…)
Wow, I am never going to not see that now. Thanks.
same here
Indeed.
Biggest problem with GraphJam – posting graphs that have been around forever, or were done by comedians (i.e. Demitri Martin).
Biggest problem with ICHC – posting images that have been around forever.
Biggest problem with FailBlog – unnecessary captions.
Biggest problem with the internet: people like to complain too much.
Seconded.
thirded….every asshat with a keyboard….
lol!
anything that has travelled around the webiverse for years has somewhere passed into public domain. if you havent seen an old thing, it’s new and the advertisers make money off you seeing it, no matter who gets “credit”.
is all knowledge a good thing?
besides, i really liked it every time i have seen it… btw, who is in the null?
Biggest problem with the forums
commenting on things thinking that people will actually give a TPS Report about the subject.
I summarize your summarized summary with an additional summarization of the summary
I am in the null set. I am fictional, didn’t you know?
Rebecca Watson. Totally in the Null set.
I believe the null set is an empty space because there are no people that mentally and physically attractive. On another note, what does it mean for a duck to sin the wind?
400 million monkeys on the net and still no one’s come up with the complete works of Shakespeare
You Sirrah, have won Ah do believe.
I think you mean Assclown. IE Mike Bolton
That’s hardly unique to the internet. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.
No, see the point is that this ‘Sunil S’ fellow didn’t make this. That’s why Alphonse complained about plagiarism.
So, first time reading a TPS Report…
Uhm, at the top it says that “All our charts are user-submitted.” Doesn’t mention anything about *user-created.* By strict definition, a chart posted yesterday somewhere else could be posted here today and be within the site rules.
Unless there’s unwritten rules? You know, the kind unsuspecting first-time users will trip and fall over because they’re not listed anywhere?
Well, the part where it says “graph by Sunil S” sure as hell indicates plagiarism.
Unless there’s some rule about possessive words about which I’m confused.
Perhaps in this case it merely means the graph is in close proximity to Sunil S…
Dude, nothing is original anymore. In fact your concept of attacking someone for copying another site is definitely taken from another site. I’m sure my rant about originality Nazi’s is also somewhere on the INTERNET.
Yeah, by some guy named Godwin, I believe…
P0wned.
I’m confuzzled.
The chart is amazing. It outlines perfectly how social interaction works.
But still, if it’s not original, give credit where it’s due.
“social interaction” you say…
.
.
I see a woman on her back with her legs up on the air, but maybe that’s just me.
That interpretation is f*cking hilarious! In a totally misogynistic way, but still…
“Null set” = head/brain
“Marriage potential” = b00biez
“Zone of pain” = va-jay-jay
“zone of pain” could also = someone else’s head?
I like that better.
.
btw, since when is it misogynistic to recognize the female form?
why isn’t it a male form then? men have pecs. you just don’t expect to see them lying on their back w/legs spread. actually women spend most of their time doing other things too. good try at defense though, better luck next time
Mirrors are a great thing.
lol
.
.
.
.
still, i’m not the only person who saw that, right?
Now that you mention it, I see it, but it looks more like a frog.
Yeah, I see that woman, too.
It´s ust my neighbor doing her yoga, so don´t worry.
This is old as hell. I first saw this 3 years ago.
It’s disturbing that you catalogued when you saw it.
Umm, what’s an f-buddy?
F*ck Buddy
Oh jesus.. I just got it.
*a little slow today*
I was in the dating zone once…. a loooong time ago.
WOE IS ME!
Now I sit firmly in the left leg of every girl’s graph
Great graph though
And stop with the plagiarism chat. As was said above this site is for the submission of graphs, they don’t have to have been created by the one who submits. I suspect 90% of the good stuff on the internet was copy/pasted from somewhere else.
you’re a f*buddy? Nice! the best of both worlds
Isn’t that the right leg?
I reckon he means the right leg (the ‘very mentally attractive but not that physically attractive’ space) actually, given the context.
Most guys wouldn’t say “dang, i wish I wasn’t a f’buddy” – at least out loud.
It may be old to some, but I’ve not seen this before, and I reckon it’s probably one of the best charts I’ve seen on this site.
Believe me, this has been around for years. How lazy is that just to find the jpg and post it here?
If you’re going to go and copy someone else’s work, the least you can do is give us the courtesy of remaking it. Particularly, in this case, in higher resolution so it doesn’t look aliased as hell.
Hell, I’ve seen this graph before on GraphJam…
I´ve seen that graph, SATC wasn´t even on back then!
too confusing
“null set”?!
Does that mean its impossible, or too stunning?
Otherwise…Great!
null set = angelina jolie & brad pitt
the phrase ‘friend zone’ has been around forever…SATC didn’t invent it…sometimes writers take inspiration from life.
wow…. I don’t care if it’s plagiarism… it’s genius and I had never seen it before…
awesome!
this one of those Rorschach graphs?
very good, whoever made it
I think its pretty dull…
the worst part of this is that it’s not even good enough to plagiarize. anyone who still thinks there’s a ‘friend zone’ should maybe get off the internet and start meeting real people…i’ve never known anyone who wouldn’t rather date their friends & especially if they are looking for long term relationship
You’re probably a little sleazy.
You’ve obviously never met me….
It’s like a bird’s eye view of tubgirl.
Looks like a woman giving birth to me….
Pwehaps incorrect credit should be clicked to solve the plagerism madness!!!!
Shopped!
This is awesome!
I can not extract an ounce of sense from this graph. I must be retarded. :/
this would be better represented in 3D with the third dimension being “How well the other party likes you”….
“F-Buddy”?