Graph by Hodde ATT
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous What Gets Automatically Filtered by my Yahoo SpamGuard | Entertainment Tonight Contents Next »
» 20 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
Kendra on What People Say When They Lear… Xydrealb on Replotted- Pol·i·ti·cian: A Pe… Dennish777 on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Breeze on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… Fred on Han Shot First, Damn It! Mr Charizard on Faith Means Never Having to Ad… Sanee on Spank the Monkey mitchells2003 on Congressional Bling ... on So Many Countless Hours Spent … ... on Han Shot First, Damn It! willohfish on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… biocake on If Only They Made Little Pouch… GermanGirl on So Many Countless Hours Spent … GermanGirl on So Many Countless Hours Spent … GermanGirl on So Many Countless Hours Spent … 
Cheezburger Company Blog
graph fail and i won’t even go into why.
how many graphs were submitted and this is the best we got??!!
agreed. Bottom of the barrel…
How can a hamburger have a size rating of 2 or 1.5.
“Yes, i ordered a .5 hamburger, not a 3.”
This is lame. Sorry.
And also, what would happened if you ordered a size “0″ hamburger? Would they come back with an empty plate? HUH?
At least give us a hamburger-as-pie chart or something.
mmm… hamburger pie…
and wtf is a size 2 hamburger? and if I went into some place and ordered a size 2 hamburger and they came back with a size 1 hamburger, I’d be like, “hey! I ordered the size 2 hamburger. This is a size 1 hamburger. That’s like half of a size 2 burger. Now go and get me a size two burger before I kick you in the nuts.”
totally.
I love this TIC answer to show just how STUPID this graph is.
Indeed. It would have been so much better if they’d just left off the units on the Y-axis.
Worst offender: Hardee’s
What about McDonald’s?
The Big Mac is a lot smaller than you would think.
I laugh at your fail.
Wow…what are the numbers on the vertical axis supposed to represent? FAIL.
We can only guess as to where the invisible third data point falls on this hamburger scale.
INVISIBLE CHEEZBURGER
glad that bothered someone else besides just me
does no one see the spelling fail??
i thought it was quite commerical…i mean comical…
my guess is the idea behind the measurements on the Y axis is the size of the item relative to the real life hamburger… though it would make more sense for it to be in percentages, and for the author to designate that.
If the author couldn’t figure out how to do a bar graph with less than three bars, couldn’t s/he have just had a third measurement that had a hamburger size of zero? Like a singularity hamburger, a ham sandwich, or some other nerdy joke?
What about “In the picture”? You can’t forget that; EVERYTHING looks so much better in the picture.
Actually the units are right. These are called normalized units. If you take the size of a real life burger to be normalized to 1 unit, the burger shown in the commercial is two units; Hence twice the size.
It is common in science.