Nah, it doesn’t need unit markings, but it could’ve been a lot better if they had Breast Size along the X-axis, Armor Required/Worn along the Y, and just had a downward slope. This looks like it took less time to draw than MS Paint takes to load.
3/ You don’t really have a sound grasp of what “sexist” means yet, but you heard someone on the TV talking about big-breasted videogame characters being sexist portrayals of women, and decided to try and wing it.
A female character in Mass Effect is fully armored, Joannna Dark from Perfect Dark, Taki from soul caliber, Jaheira from Baldur’s Gate. There are plenty of other female fully armored characters in video games. I think the main point here is the graph sucks and is stupid, maybe you should label the X and Y axis or just learn how to make a graph in excel.
I loved this graph. It is so simple, and so true. For some reason in the gaming industry, the rule “the lesser the armor, the higher the AC” is true when it comes to females.
Second
Wait, I mean…dammit!…
http://graphjam.com/2008/10/28/song-chart-memes-first-in-the-comments/
was it too hard to make this is some program other than paint?
*in
So … what do the X and Y axes represent?
It’s implicit.
so true!
Poorly rendered, but quite true.
I don’t think it needs unit markings on the side. However, MS paint makes a good idea slightly worse.
Nah, it doesn’t need unit markings, but it could’ve been a lot better if they had Breast Size along the X-axis, Armor Required/Worn along the Y, and just had a downward slope. This looks like it took less time to draw than MS Paint takes to load.
Yeah, that’s exactly what I was thinking. I mean, most people know what the poster is getting at, but it doesn’t actually make sense.
Simplicity is the key to humor. Good job!
Someone-who-understands-funny WIN!
You are taking this WAY too seriously. Relax. *hands you a Xanax*
This was funny! The simplest concepts are often the most informative!
What Craig said! The fun of this one is it’s simplicity. Sort of like the ‘mental simplicity’ of what it’s charting. LOL.
yeah peple are taking these graphs way too seriously.
Inorite?
That is silly and unrealistic.
So sexist. FAIL!!!
Its not sexist. Do you ever play any video games that have women in them? After a while you’ll pick up on this.
Why do you think the men have so much armor? Same concept.
Samus Aran’s pretty much the only exception I could think of.
That’s why Prime is so awesome……..worth that 18 hours of gameplay to watch her take off her armor.
Oh, and the Spacew Pirate ownage was cool too.
uhm. play more video games.
Let me guess:
1/ You’re 13.
2/ You don’t understand the graph.
3/ You don’t really have a sound grasp of what “sexist” means yet, but you heard someone on the TV talking about big-breasted videogame characters being sexist portrayals of women, and decided to try and wing it.
You rule!
I can has cheat sheet?
hahaha woooooooow..
And Samus Aran is only the exception because in the first game they wanted to keep Samus gender a surprise until the end.
It’s not sexist just because it talks about boobies!
The concept was good, but the chart has basic errors, and this ruins the effect.
Sheer fail
Your title idea is not funny and too long.
A female character in Mass Effect is fully armored, Joannna Dark from Perfect Dark, Taki from soul caliber, Jaheira from Baldur’s Gate. There are plenty of other female fully armored characters in video games. I think the main point here is the graph sucks and is stupid, maybe you should label the X and Y axis or just learn how to make a graph in excel.
umm… joanna dark was not armored in the N64 Perfect Dark. fully clothed, yes. armored, not so much.
this is great. but you know that boobies provide much better protection than any epic quality armor can
Really, really stupid graph…
I loved this graph. It is so simple, and so true. For some reason in the gaming industry, the rule “the lesser the armor, the higher the AC” is true when it comes to females.
Either that or in the video game world, kevlar and steel are perfectly acceptable materials for implants.
useless without pics.
somebody had to say it…
Sometimes details aren’t needed. The point comes across regardless
If you want precision and detail, mayhap you’ve come to the wrong place?
I like it!
Sheesh, what a bunch of sad nerdish morons! Didn’t you get the joke?
Very funny.
~chuckles and moves on~