Graph by Catherine S
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Venn Diagrams | The Ironic Truth about Venn Diagrams Next »
» 19 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply
-
Latest Comments
Chris on So Many Countless Hours Spent … mwah on Replotted: That’s Just… Mr. Wayne on So Many Countless Hours Spent … tehrawb on High on Life? No, High on… The Master on Replotted: That’s Just… The Master on So Many Countless Hours Spent … RCC on It’s Just For Show Kitten on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… cheezies on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Moiz Siddiqui on Crapping Has Never Been More… Abcde F. Ghij on If Only They Made Little Pouch… SHOTGUN CHUCK on High on Life? No, High on… JV1138 on The Scoop on Poop Gallade475 on Classic: The Hips Aren’t… headedtoaussie on Art of Trolling: Nothing, Noth… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
Zuerst!
and thats so true.
So the likelihood goes up from 1 (i.e. 100%, “all the time”) to… er, 12 ?
Normalization fail? ;o)
Or would that be 100% probability of sitting next to 12 snoring fat guys? (That would be quite an accomplishment in a euclidian, uh, airplane)
Yep. Vertical axis would make so much more sense if it was percentage from 0-100%
I concur. Graph idea = win. Graph y-axis = fail.
I’m thinking its a percentage (which makes just as much sense as it being next to 12 guys)
Guys, chill out. It’s just a silly graph, for cryin out loud! No one’s gonna build a space ship based on the results of this graph.
But, if you want to be technical, then “1″ would represent the likelihood of sitting next to a snoring fat guy on a 1 hour trip, and the other numbers would all be multiples of that value. So the values in the Y axis are all relative values.
Actually… when calculating the trajectories for any manned NASA launch, it is imperative for the astronauts to be aware of the likelihood of sitting next to a snoring fat guy and it’s correlation to the expected length of the journey… Especially if the likelihood goes from 100% to 1200%
Ditto. Clever idea. Execution needs work.
dawidi’s comment rates a 10 in my book, though. (on a scale of 1 to 10, that is, where 10 is high)
ummm….its 12 likelihoods. Never heard of that measurement aih?
comments make my head hurt.
Ha! True. I should do a graph: type of technical imperfection in graph vs. likelihood of inane discussion nitpicking said imperfection.
Or babies. Don’t forget the probability of sitting near a baby. Probability of screaming increased with each interval over four hours.
Whenever I am on a plane, I am inevitably seated next to a baby who smokes.
Might wanna check the exhaust on that baby.
Does the probability of a Billy Idol presence decrease if the plane is not en route to Las Vegas?
For me, the increasing probability is of BECOMING the snoring fat guy.
Sorry, person next to me, but I’m fat, and the flight is boring, so I’m taking a nap.
that’s exactly what I was thinking.
I find this graph slightly offensive.
ah – but what if you are the snoring guy?
what about distance from airport to home and probability of multiple bags getting lost?