-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Relative Value of Birds | When I Am Late For Work Next »
» 8 TPS Reports
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Y U No Like Memebase?
Newsletter Sign-up
See Random Graphs!
-
Latest Comments
Niko on Followed By a Critical Against… Niko on Hand Wash Only!? Evertide on I’ll Just Scrape Out Thi… PianoManGidley on Replotted: That’s Just… Exodiafinder687 on Probability Someone Will Insul… JoeL on High on Life? No, High on… Exodiafinder687 on Re-Plotted: Problem, Flame… Exodiafinder687 on I Swear to God If You Don… Exodiafinder687 on I Swear to God If You Don… zak on So Many Countless Hours Spent … CaioNV on Proof That Women Are Evil… Starlancer on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Malkiot on So Many Countless Hours Spent … Malkiot on So Many Countless Hours Spent … meh on Replotted- Pol·i·ti·cian: A Pe… -
Most Popular Graphs
- Vote on Graphs
- So Many Countless Hours Spent Playing Final Fantasy
- High on Life? No, High on Ponies
- The Phallic Graph of Phalluses
- Art of Trolling: Nothing, Nothing, and More Nothing
- Classic: The Hips Aren't Hip
- Replotted- Pol·i·ti·cian: A Person Who Thinks They Know What's Best for Everyone
- Hand Wash Only!?
- If Only They Made Little Pouches in Your Pants That Could Hold Such Things
- Replotted: That's Just Cheating
- I Swear to God If You Don't Shut Up About the Nonexistence of God...
- Congressional Bling
Graph Archives
Cheezburger Company BlogAbout GraphJam
See New Memes



There is so much more graph in this subject. Go back to the scene in which Deckard and Bryant are going over the fugitive replicants. They are supposed to be five, but only four of them die in the movie: Leon, Pris, Roy, and Zhora. Apparently, the guy playing Bryant said the wrong number, they had a take with the right number in it, but for whatever reason, it didn’t get used.
I swear, if there’s a grosser, more boring movie out there, I haven’t seen it.
In response to FishyFred, I thought the graph was a reference to the Director’s Cut’s origami unicorn at the end, implying that Deckard is most definitely a replicant.
Either way, an amusing graph.
Platypus: No, you were right about the graph, but for such an awesome movie, Blade Runner has some serious continuity errors and goofs.
Platypus – this is my graph – and you’re correct: it was just the unicorn thing implying Deckard is a replicant, which the original film doesn’t.
FishyFred – you’re right too. There’s a lot more here, but it was my first graph and I was trying to keep it simple.
I think this is an excellent example of the best sorts of graphs: simple, funny, to the point. The creator was pretty obviously just referencing (is a SPOILER warning even necessary at this point?) the fact that in the original release, it’s rather ambiguous whether or not Deckard is a replicant, so most people accept that there is only one left alive (Rachael); in the Director’s Cut, it’s fairly clear there are two.
Looking forward to seeing mroe from this guy.
omg im watching blade runner RIGHT NOW ;p
I have the impression that Decker’s Asian coworker is also a replicant.
This movie is so far removed from the book “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” that it is pretty useless looking there for the answer.
Anyhoo, neat graph.