« Previous Probability of waterfowl running around in circles by species | Relative Kickiness of Common Experiences as Compared to You Next »
Graph by: Kim A. Østergaard
Office Space
Ah… Yeah. About your graph… It’s just we’re putting new coversheets on all the graphs before they go out now. So if you could go ahead and try to remember to do that from now on, that’d be great…
 | qwerfvtgb on Know Your Nerds |
 | Fred on I Love You… Figurat… |
| Fred on Know Your Nerds |
 | thejackanape on We’re Number One! |
 | Tadzo on A Foolproof Plan |
 | Rae on Know Your Nerds |
 | Ivy on Know Your Nerds |
 | natalie on We’re Number One! |
 | ouliygliyg on They’re Getting Loose Wi… |
| natalie on We’re Number One! |
| natalie on We’re Number One! |
| natalie on We’re Number One! |
 | FW on It’s Not Hard |
| natalie on Would You Look at This Ra… |
 | Faraz on I’m Not Sure How Any of … |
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
As an Office Space purist, I’m afraid that graph is inaccurate. The was only slightly less (one slice) cake than there were people. Given the quantity of people in that office, the graph is very misleading.
You can find an accurate graph here: http://i31.tinypic.com/26413b9.jpg
@Adam B.
Indeed. Awesome.
You may be right. but my argument for this inaccuracy is the number of counted pieces cut from the cake, does not match the number of people in attendance.
Oh… and that the number does exceed 1. Yeah.
Actually, before I clicked on the cheat sheet, I was thinking this was more of an Eddie Izzard type thing –
We didn’t expect such a rush!
cake
But there’s no sense crying over every mistake.
But da caek is a lie!
Regardless of the amount of cake, if the science gets done and a gun is made, everything is okay.
I loved this graph about 20% as much as I love that movie =D